• GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    A child dying from something that could have been prevented cannot be dismissed as a simple statistical insignificance. That’s the most cynical thing I’ve heard in a while.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Individual tragedies are never going to be prevented. You might as well mandate kids exist in giant hamster balls 24/7.

      Oh, but then they might suffocate.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s perfectly preventable in other countries. In the western world, this is pretty much a uniquely American experience.

        • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          We should ban seat belts, then. Theres a non-zero chance that they could trap you in a car in a crash leading to your death. Never mind that the chance is statistically insignificant.

          Also, do other countries mandate this safety feature?

          • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Seat belts are designed specifically to save people’s lives. In action, they prevent a lot more deaths than they cause. Firearms are designed specifically to take people’s lives. In action, they cause a lot more deaths than they prevent.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          You can’t undo the 2nd amendment, there are over 400 million guns in the country.

          The fact that there are only 11 deaths per year on a population of 400 million guns shows just how insignificant the problem is.

          It’s not even a “1 in a million” kind of thing.

          It’s a 1 in 36 million kind of thing.

          • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            It seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Yeah, no amendment can be undone in the current climate.

              Doing it requires 290 votes in the House, a body that last needed 15 tries to get a 218 vote simple majority to decide who their own leader will be.

              Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate, a body that’s blocked from doing anything by a 60 vote majority to break a filibuster.

              If by some miracle, both of those things happen, then the change needs to be ratified by 38 states.

              In the last election, Trump won 31 states, so he’d need 7 Harris states to back him on repealing an amendment. Aint happening.