• Ezergill@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was time a year and a half ago already. UN is an impotent organisation, and they won’t ever do it

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nor should they. The purpose of the UN isn’t to be allies. It’s to maintain diplomatic relations so that there is always an alternative to military force to resolve disputes. Russia is the last country I would want kicked out of the UN.

      • Ezergill@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They shouldn’t get kicked off the UN proper, but I am (and the article) talking about excluding them from the security council. Plus they shouldn’t have the veto power

        • Harrison [He/Him]@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The security council veto power isn’t something handed out for being nice, it’s largely “we have an arsenal of hundreds of nuclear weapons and are theoretically willing to use them”

        • Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While that seems a good choice, the same argument could be made for the US - we do some shady shit. Okay, we do a lot of shady shit. In a way the UN is an “everyone gets a trophy” situation, and it keeps them coming back [insert Bronze Medal Celebration meme].