Samsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-22 年前2023-08-09.jpglemmy.mlimagemessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up11.72Karrow-down1125
arrow-up11.59Karrow-down1image2023-08-09.jpglemmy.mlSamsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-22 年前message-square192fedilink
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 年前In a programmatic context? Sure. In an “I want to be able to comprehend this by glancing at it” context: absolutely not. 2023-08-10 15:45:33-04:00 is WAY more human legible than 1691696733.
minus-squareorangeboats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 年前What, you don’t remember your time in Unix timestamps? Filthy casuls.
minus-squareborstis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前It’s super easy arithmetic too, just remember ”Pi seconds is a nanocentury.”
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 年前Your prayer has been answered! Hear ye: https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_time.asp
Or unix epoch time
In a programmatic context? Sure.
In an “I want to be able to comprehend this by glancing at it” context: absolutely not.
2023-08-10 15:45:33-04:00is WAY more human legible than1691696733.What, you don’t remember your time in Unix timestamps? Filthy casuls.
It’s super easy arithmetic too, just remember ”Pi seconds is a nanocentury.”
deleted by creator
Your prayer has been answered! Hear ye:
https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_time.asp
deleted by creator
deleted by creator