Lebanon, once thought of as among the most liberal parts of the Middle East, is poised to ban global hit movie “Barbie.” More conservative Kuwait said Wednesday that it had gone ahead with a ban due to its promotion of homosexuality.

  • fidodo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think the news story is that Mattel is losing a little money from a small market. I think the news story is the oppression

    • tenitchyfingers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course. People who want to see it will see it, even if it means piracy. And that’s why piracy is inherently good and it won’t damage the company much so it doesn’t really matter.

    • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The news story is marketing for the movie. Any moral stance depicted is to drive readers and thus ads for the magazine. It is all marketing.

      • luciferofastora@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean the magazine would pay people to write a story people would want to read… only to make money for the magazine? Like, they’re doing it for profit, and not out of the goodness of their hearts? Next you’re going to tell me my grocer is only selling me food to generate revenue.

        There’s a difference between “just marketing” and “buy this stuff, but also, turns out Lebanon has quite some distance to go in terms of human rights in general and gender equality in particular”. Companies can’t have morals, because they’re not a natural person, but the humans working for them can, and it’s not unthinkable for this story to be both: An expression of moral frustration on part of the journalist that also happens to be profitable for their employer.