• hopolapopola@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    disgust at the vast hoarding of wealth and suffering caused by billionaires is one thing, but openly revelling in their death is gross and i wish more people would say it. it often feels like people have a streak of sadism that they want to direct at an “acceptable” target through bloody revolution, rather than being leftist because of compassion for other living beings

    • ATGM 🚀@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just honestly didn’t give a shit about them, and still it was all over the news.

      How many people died in car crashes eachday this coverage was everywhere?

      A group of rich people with poor research skills exploded themselves, and it just doesn’t matter to me.

      We don’t spend half this time crying over much bigger tragedies.

    • jadedctrl@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I reckon that people become leftists out of compassion, but the dehumanizing rhetoric seems cool and edgy; so they slide into it, thinking it’s OK.

      Hate systems, not people. Don’t eat the rich, eat their money.

      • Zelsabriel@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that years of struggle just to meet basic needs leads to dangerous anger, resentment, and bitterness. Tbh billionaires are the ones who have rigged the system against us with decades of lobbying and most, if not all of them, would gladly see us dead in a cost benefit analysis if it gained them profit, so I have no problem with people taking pleasure in their misfortune. They made their choices and current public opinion is the consequence of that. No one gets to and stays at billionaire status off of pure merit alone…

  • Laneus@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, billionaires also trend towards the ghoulish, so maybe it’s appropriate?

  • RadioRat (he/they)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh. Billionaires are each directly responsible for meteoric contributions to human suffering and loss of life. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to dismiss the humanity of folks who actively devalue the humanity of the vast majority of humans. Eat the rich.

  • Artemisia@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ignoring the fact that some of these people were billionaires, I think all of them forfeited any respect for their lives when they chose to step into a metal tube and put several miles of water between them and the breathable atmosphere, for fun. Same as mountaineers choosing to climb into a “death zone”. If you choose to go there for fun then that’s how much YOU value your own life and your relationships. I don’t see why I should then have a huge amount of sympathy when these people inevitably die.

    I cannot understand why the military was mobilised at huge cost? Surely these people should sign a much more wide ranging waiver saying they are doing this at their own risk and should not expect any rescue attempts beyond what the organisers insurance policy covers?

    • midnight@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think all of them forfeited any respect for their lives when they chose to step into a metal tube and put several miles of water between them and the breathable atmosphere, for fun.

      Sure, I think it’s maybe fair to say that about ceo, who cut all sorts of corners with the construction (and it was a carbon fiber tube, not metal, which was the main problem)

      However, the 19 year old kid on board was dragged along by his dad, and was reportedly terrified and didn’t want to go. I think it shows an extreme lack of empathy to say his life had no value because of the situation he was put in.

    • Thatcephalopod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I cannot understand why the military was mobilised at huge cost?

      I thought this at first. However, it was the Coast Gaurd who was doing a lot of the rescue operation. Rescuing people from their bad boating decisions is most of what the Coast Gaurd does - if we don’t want to pay for it then we’d need to disband the Coast Gaurd. The only options were for us to pay for them to sit and watch or pay for them to try to help. At least they got more experience with these sort of rescues by trying to help.

  • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What anyone chooses to spend their money on. Is none of my business.

    How they earn it and what share of taxation they face, really is the only debate any of us should feel entitled to.

  • skogens_ro@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reading reddit and now kbin and lemmy about stories like this one makes it easy to see how socialist regimes so often turn to authoritarianism.