Summary

The Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to reject Donald Trump’s request to delay a law banning TikTok or forcing its sale by Jan. 19, 2025.

TikTok’s parent, ByteDance, claims the ban violates First Amendment rights, but the DOJ argued the law targets foreign ownership, not free speech, and passes constitutional scrutiny.

Trump, despite opposing a ban publicly, asked the Court to extend the deadline to seek a political resolution.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Jan. 10, with the ban set to take effect before Trump’s inauguration.

  • eletes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6か月前

    Eh this is the one social media that the oligarchs can’t censor so I’m fine with it sticking around. I’d rather have options than Elon and Zuck controlling the majority methods for average joes to get information out. Cause it doesn’t seem like the fediverse is going mainstream for a while

    • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6か月前

      What evidence do you have that oligarchs in any nation cannot influence your TikTok algorithm? Like… we should assume they can by default until proven innocent.

      • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6か月前

        Even if it’s just a competing team of oligarchs fighting over who can produce the most amount of animosity and mistrust of the other, they’re going to accidentally stumble across some shit that the other one doesn’t want you to see and then they’ll show it to you.

        It turns out we don’t have any way of getting clean unbiased sources so the best we can do is just have a lot of different ones with different biases since there is no such thing as clean public media anymore.