

No they don’t.
They think saying they do will make them rich.
No they don’t.
They think saying they do will make them rich.
I agree with most of your points, but vocal fry?!
That’s such an asinine thing to care about.
id say it’s quite good, storage and distribution can get expensive
ergo, there are extra steps, which is a pita, but not insurmountable.
it is good to learn C, even if you’re never gonna touch it again. It teaches you what other languages abstract away.
Humans failed this guy.
I am not arguing this point, I agree.
A search engine presents the info that is available, it doesnt also help talk you into doing it.
A stranger doing it in a chatroom doing it should go to prison, as has happened in the past. Should this not also be illegal for LLM’s?
The fact the parents might be to blame doesn’t take away from how openai’s product told a kid how to off himself and helped him hide it in the process.
copying a comment from further down:
ChatGPT told him how to tie the noose and even gave a load bearing analysis of the noose setup. It offered to write the suicide note. Here’s a link to the lawsuit. [Raine Lawsuit Filing](https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Raine-v-OpenAI-Complaint-8-26-25.pdf)
Had a human said these things, it would have been illegal in most countries afaik.
do you think they report that distinction to the advertisers?
“don’t build the torment nexus”
if you start studying now, chances are the market will have improved when you graduate.
now do social credits!
I am very anger
then why the fuck is this newsworthy? ugh. Why is there such a huge hateboner for firefox lately?
fun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”
maybe it’s the other way around. I’m not convinced budgets in the $100 million range makes sense.