md5 for example is already vulnerable. People have figured out how to manipulate data into having a pre-specified hash. Meaning someone could engineer deliberate hash collisions and serve you any file they like.

SHA-256 doesn’t (i think) have this issue, so far hah.

you have to fucking hope no one figures out how to backwards engineer the hashing algorithm you choose

Well, those ones does it at the cost of size. In order to ensure separation they are comparatively huge.

If the adversary has physical access you are generally pwned either way

deleted by creator

It’s pronounced Throatwobbler Mangrove

https://youtu.be/tyQvjKqXA0Y

you have at your disposal all the tools you need to learn the answer to that question within a minute

porque no los dos?

That would be great, but AI detection doesn’t work reliably at all.

Here’s a study https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z#Sec19

I need to cut down on my internet consumption.

it wouldn’t be much of a joke if we didn’t pretend to take it seriously no?

While I don’t necessarily agree or disagree with the ban…

In what way is this a free speech ban?!

star,t stop and ok would be the same in swedish as in english

that was before this law, so quite irrelevant to the question.

deleted by creator

yeah, dont buy those

deleted by creator

Only limited by the speed of light,

What exactly do you think the normal ip data is limited by on the same optical cable?

I thought we were talking about quantum entaglement and spooky action at a distance, which is famously not limited by the speed of light?

Am I missing something obvious?