A bang-maid is a woman who men reduce to those two functions.

It’s common in patriarchal, reactionary cultures like evangelical Christianity and other fundamentalist religions. See the “tradwife” fetish for more info.

But I was hoping you’d provide more examples of why women are disgusted by reactionaries!

I heard that they also hate being treated like bang-maids, too. Do you have any examples of why they should be fine with that situation?

Oh please keep going; you couldn’t have shown more of your whole ass, but I bet you’re not one to turn down a challenge.

You have no way of knowing, but it’s sidesplittingly funny for a man who is extremely vocal about restricting the rights of women to make their own informed healthcare decisions to then cry about how I’m being mean to men who do that.

Please continue, because it’s hilarious every time.

What would help men is to keep them from being reactionary dickheads: something you want to happen.

So I don’t think I’ll be taking advice from you, thanks!

LMAO!

Not being a mysogonystic asshole will kill some men?

Your fragility is showing. Is this the “personal responsibility” reactionaries are always crowing about?

Won’t people think of the poor reactionaries who need a woman to control to feel like a real man??

It’s not fair that women want a partner who thinks of them as a full human being who deserves to make her own decisions regarding her healthcare, cares about their community, and isn’t an antisocial piece of shit.

We are entitled to those women!! How dare they act with full autonomy right in our faces!!

You can’t even type correctly and other people are trash? You must have very low standards.

CW: SA

Remember Todd Akin’s comment on sexual assault?

"It seems to me, from what I understand from doctors, that’s really rare,” Mr. Akin said of pregnancies from rape. “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something: I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be of the rapist, and not attacking the child.”

Not that it matters if an abortion is requested due to rape or any other reason, but this quote really drives home that it isn’t really about protecting children despite that last line: they think all women who get abortions should be punished for being murderous sluts despite all evidence to the contrary.

It’s pretty shocking, but I can fit 2 Ds in my mouth.

Westerns can either be amazing or terrible.

Not much in between IMO.

Remember when they banned the word “fascist?”

Self-awarenes doesn’t seem to be their strength.

According to Hill, Clarence Thomas asked her out socially many times during her two years of employment as his assistant, and after she declined his requests, he used work situations to discuss sexual subjects and push advances. “He spoke about… such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,” she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described “his own sexual prowess” and the details of his anatomy. Hill also recounted an instance in which Thomas examined a can of Coke on his desk and asked, “Who has put pubic hair on my Coke?”

I have yet to find anything at all better about “new” Outlook.

My favorite part is how they removed useful functions that worked perfectly well on the old version.