No, my name’s Dan.

That is the definition…, they’re used a single time and dumped into the environment. That’s what single use plastics are, I’ve legit never heard of anyone aside from you refer to glass as single use.

They say glass new and recycled but accept that a large amount of glass bottles still end up in the ecosystem.

I didn’t say it defined single use glass, that’s just a you thing. It defines sickle use for the article in which it is used solely to describe items that are used once and dumped into the ecosystem. It is specifically never referred to in reference to glass in the article.

That’s exactly what it says.

But as these bottles are largely single-use, many of them are discarded and dumped in the earth’s ecosystems, where they constitute a significant portion of all environmental waste.

They only counted recyclable bottles as single use if discarded anywhere but a recycling center assuming they may or may not be recycled so they assume it’s trash until it’s recycled or degraded.

They’re only single use if they aren’t recycled, the article states that as well.

I know, what I’m saying is no glass bottle is explicitly non recyclable there’s just a lack of ability to recycle in the us for whatever dumb business monster reasoning.

It’s mostly just the us that no longer have recycling for bottles. Most modern countries have automated collection machines.

You think it’s just Biden that has hands in this? Israel would never have been so bold if the USA didn’t move it’s embassy to Jerusalem and that choice was not Bidens.

We have a top secret base there, just like Korea and Vietnam early troops usually come in and break shit you can’t let go.

No it’s because Russia is preoccupied and we’re testing near peer weapons from 3+decades ago there with little to no risk to mainland usa. It’s morally wrong sure but it does at least make sense.

I mean sorta but not really, we’re selling most stuff at a loss. The benefit is really seeing how well our stuff works against the enemy or was designed to fight. Don’t get me wrong people are getting rich but that’s from buying more weapons to replace the ones we sold.

It doesn’t, Israel is going to do whatever they want just as they always have. We’re they not aggressive yet, did I miss calm level headed Israeli sometime in the last 50 years? No?

Iran never intended to strike with authority, they struck back because they are intended to, they didn’t want involved and now they have every reason not to be.

Iran isn’t now not has it ever truly been a moderating influence in Israel.

There’s no change to the math, even without the us Israel is more than equipped to lay siege to Gaza for the foreseeable future and Iran had no intention of getting involved.

Removed by mod

No I mean they can intercept Israeli missiles and they aren’t Israeli controlled.

Not really. Iran wants an excuse to sit it out and they just got it.

What it will do is give the us more intelligence agents in the ground figuring out what the actual duck is going on.

We don’t care about isrealis killing ours. Neither attacking a ship nor running a civilian over with a bulldozer raised too much issue.

I’m not opposed to this one honestly, it’s defensive and Israelis are quite literally holding the world hostage in a way that every other nuclear power simply implies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

Well no dispite musk since he’s well publicized to be a hinderence aide from the money he provides.

No idea just sorta stopped I guess.

They did fine, budget dweebs just never thought they were enough of an advantage to offset the cost. They stay in service because people in the actual field want them around, it’s the same reason a lot of obsolete “useless” weapons stay in service.

There’s more reason they’ve been trying to retire then since before many people here were born and yet haven’t been. Troops love them, armchair strategists that have been saying they aren’t worth the money don’t. Who should I care about more I wonder.

Point to where exactly it says now, it doesn’t right?

So your point is any planning is futile, you must be a proper strategic genius.

You said we don’t waste logistics on militarily useless morale boosters. Clearly the us does as do most militaries, good cas is well worth every penny. CAS that scares the shit out of your enemy and raises your troops spirits is even better.

It’s never been a forward weapon, it was never meant to be. No one is suggesting to send it now they’re saying it may be useful to ship pilots and get them started training and as far as I’m aware that’s wrapped into funding.