

I didn’t both sides this. To clarify; I meant that if republicans brought forth policies to preserve personal privacy, or the democrats decide to bust up monopolistic companies- doesn’t matter which side tried to bring up any of these ideas; they would be so neutered by the time the ink dried the impact would be negligible.
I can see how you could take my comment as both sides-ing it. I haven’t seen either party do anything that impacts the quality of daily life (in a positive way) for myself, friends or family. The examples of abortion and gun control are just examples where the overwhelming majority of citizens want one thing, in very clear terms, and the government does absolutely nothing about it despite the wishes of the people.
I’m also clearly not advocating for any third party. If you take the very common knowledge that the government no longer works for the people and twist that into throwing away your vote on Kennedy or Nader your problems are larger than limited browser selection.
And how’s that antitrust case going? Where are we on net neutrality? Student loan forgiveness for like 10% of borrowers? Expanding Medicare? I only criticize democrats because that’s the party that’s supposed to do things for us. The American republicans are Christo- fascists who’ve long abandoned any pretense of constitutional law or responsibility for their country. Either way- we have crumbling infrastructure, hungry children, women dying because religious abortion restrictions, and lead pipes. And these shit bags can just send another $25 billion to kill more brown people in the Middle East.
So forgive me if I doubt they’ll take the time to learn what http means or even consider something that doesn’t have a wealthy donor behind it.
I didn’t read this whole infographic, or check the page numbers.
I feel the employment protection for federal employees is likely to have long lasting negative, or even catastrophic, impacts. If a federal employee who, for example, develops public messaging about healthcare issues does not follow policy directives from the executive branch, they can be just shit canned. This allows political motivation of whichever party occupies the White House to override science based policy and the best interests of the public.
Now extend this to building codes; low income rentals could be built with safety as a low priority. Or food and drug regulations, forget gmo, we’ll be rinsing off poison pesticides if we’re lucky enough to have safe water.
Now; if you were a subject matter expert in let’s say, rural water resources and treatment; would you rather take a lower salary to work in the public sector and be fired when you don’t endanger a whole geographic population? Or keep that decent professor job, or take a fat paycheck to work in the private sector?
No one of any talent in the stem fields will consider federal jobs for the foreseeable future. The one benefit of government work, besides respectable benefits, is it’s damn near impossible to get fired- it’s a very stable albeit low paying position.
Shits fucked