Then why nightmare shape?

j/k I don’t kill them

Thanks I fixed it.

Religious sects are just factions with differing headcanons about their religious text’s characters.

Sounds like a drone to me. 😋

Why? Why release someone on house arrest who is a FUCKING RAPIST AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING GANG LEADER? How is that in the best interests of anyone but this POS?

What about making TikTok’s? Please say he can’t.

Oh hey, tell your boy that we’re tiling at my house too! I bet he does a great job (when he’s done with his box break).

Thank you, I will check it out!

I agree. I wish more capitalists in charge did!

Could you be more specific? I’ve never used tampermonkey before, but I’m willing to try it.

from Wikipedia:

The labour market is traditionally characterized by a high degree of union membership rates and collective agreement coverage.

Well, there’s the problem. Our capitalists say that’s stupid, they’ll just lose money!

Don’t hurt yourself in your confusion!

Yeah, I get what you’re saying, but between more money and a ping pong table, which do you think most people would choose? If they wanted to imply a more casual/fun/less-stress environment, they should have said that, but implying a ping pong table would motivate people to stay is like thinking dangling your keys in front of a baby to stop its crying will keep it happy forever. At least a pay raise is helpful to me.

So ping pong table falls under the third point right? More ping pong = more fun = better culture? Right? /s just for clarity

Listen, speaking as an American, we know Danes have better quality of life, but we’ll be damned if we will sacrifice capitalism to get there! Our motto is “if you’re not working, you’re losing money!” That only applies to the lower ranks, of course.

Seriously tho, I would love to live in a society that expects companies to hold the well-being of their employees over profits (not that these two are mutually exclusive), and the culture is changing slowly, but we’re not there yet.

Well, in a truly “free” society, yes freedom of speech would constitute freedom from “social consequences.”

Just as people can refuse to listen, they also can refuse to interact with persons that say things that upset them. This is a social consequence, and one that would be still be present in a “truly free society”.

Yeah, I get that. It’s a shame we can’t get it Federally legalized.

I want to know whether this could result in a court case overturning the new standards.

Yes! Like I guess I could just give all this money to Illinois and improve their economy…

Funny considering the woman is an alcoholic drunk driver.

Even the medical ones for cataracts and arthritis are out. In Iowa, you can only have pot if you currently have cancer and/or are dying. That’s not completely true, but it is only for the most extreme medical conditions.