https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frets_on_Fire

It’s been available since 2006, works very well

Is there mathematical proof for this? It sounds like it could be true, but also sounds like you could actively create a floor which it wasn’t true for

Rtf is far more lightweight than docx. It’s closer to markdown.

I meant easier in terms of infrastructure already existing. Things like vehicle-to-grid, and Tesla Powerwalls are already on the market, so with the right incentives the power storage in the grid can scale with the speed renewables are scaling up.

It won’t be exactly inline, which is why windfarms are built with the ability to switch off if the grid rejects the power they’re creating, but it’s a start.

I agree with you about the failures in power delivery infrastructure. The UK is very slow to connect up new wind and solar farms because the grid cannot scale up fast enough. New wind farms sit idle for months before they’re connected to the grid, which is pretty crappy. Needs more focus and investment, maybe even marketplace competition to get things going, if we’re looking for capitalist solutions to things.

Right, this is essentially another form of battery. Maybe it’ll work out. It doesn’t require flooding an entire river valley somewhere, so that’s nice.

If you’re going to create infrastructure to use the extra power, you may as well do useful work with it.

Aluminium smelting is about the most energy intensive thing we do, so better electricity management around that would be far more useful to far more people than creating digital assets for board members to get excited about. Just as an example.

Realistically the easiest way to use cheap/free electricity is to charge electric cars with it. Then we have energy storage and offset power usage later on when electricity is more expensive. There are plenty of ways to continue to make money off that process even if the electricity itself costs very little.

Wasting energy isn’t the same as investing

It’s their land. What more should be required to stop people from dumping their crap on it?

By which I mean, not “what would have stopped them?”, as fences, armed guards and tanks may have stopped them.

I mean, “what is the minimum requirement to ensure land isn’t filled with other people’s, or companies, stuff?”

For me, if they want to store stuff on some land, they should make sure they own it first.

One man controlling access to a sizable percentage of the world’s internet access doesn’t solve much.

It does change the way people think about history though

Citation needed

Another one? Is it common for people to find it annoying when you suggest religion is somehow a solution for things?

TopSixHour

Jsonb in postgres is fine, I’ve been using it for years. Much better than letting mongodb anywhere near the stack.

In the shape of a kitten

They should tow them outside of the environment

Matilda?

The Animatrix described it fairly closely

I’ve seen this before, but didn’t realise they got milkdrop working. I bought an MMX compatible processor specifically to be able to run this, back in the day.

And he also made false teeth