If it gets to the Supreme Court, I’m sure they’ll go down on them all night long.
If it gets to the Supreme Court, I’m sure they’ll go down on them all night long.
I absolutely agree that it can’t create finished content of any particular value. For my D&D use case, its value is instead as a brainstorming tool; it can churn out enough ideas quickly enough that it’s easy for me to find a couple of gems that I can polish up into something usable.
This is why my most frequent use of it is brainstorming scenarios for my D&D game: it’s really good at making up random bullshit.
Here’s the first few paragraphs:
Aug 26 (Reuters) - Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan’s initiative to use antitrust laws to protect workers faces a key test on Monday when the agency will argue the merger between grocery chain Kroger (KR.N), and its rival Albertsons (ACI.N), would crush unionized workers’ bargaining power.
Khan and her fellow antitrust enforcers in the Biden administration have sought to use antitrust laws - deployed in recent decades mostly to protect consumers against high prices - to combat what they view as anticompetitive practices squeezing workers’ paychecks.
Labor has been an area of focus for Khan, a former law professor and congressional antitrust counsel, who took the reins of the agency in June 2021.
With laying off 100 employees?
Life doesn’t adhere to waterfall methodology: we don’t have to do one first, and then the other. We can progressively disarm as we’re addressing the problems you mentioned…
Not the person you’re asking, but my general understanding is that different products would be required to be their own companies, so advertising, Android, and Chrome would all be separate businesses.
Along with that, I’ll add in “number” vs “amount”:
Ah interesting, thanks!
Interesting! Sounds like they may have changed things a few times, or maybe my co-worker’s memory has some gaps.
A coworker of mine has worked with CrowdStrike in the past; I haven’t. He said that the releases he was familiar with from them in the past were all staged into groups and customers were encouraged to test internally before applying them; not sure if this is a different product or what, but it seems like a big step backwards of what he’s saying is right.
I do kind of wish the dogs were so sitting around playing poker instead of eating, though.
Can’t have autistic chickens! /s
That’s because in America we’re so concerned about contaminants on shells that we clean all the protection off the outside, making the shells porous enough for bacteria to get through. Store-bought eggs in the US so have to be refrigerated.
Hahaha:
if you continue to
try { thisBullshit(); }
you are going tocatch (theseHands)
Definitely; OP’s linked article doesn’t have any quotes that refer to copyright, while this one of yours adds a lot of context that was otherwise missing. There’s a world of difference between allowing retention of IP addresses and creating a cleaning house for IPs suspected of distributing works.
Two of the employees were twins. It wasn’t planned, but it did give us a chance to see if twins were a weak point.
No, it gave you a chance to see if that particular set of twins was a weak point.
In fact, I myself could only tell them apart by their clothes. They had very different styles.
This makes it sound like you only tried one particular set of twins–unless there were multiple sets, and in each set the two had very different styles? I’m no statistician, but a single set doesn’t seem statistically significant.
I don’t see a good way to put it on a keychain; the only hole looks tiny, and right on an edge where it’s likely to snap after a year or so of wear.
I’m thinking olive.