If the company is penalized for being at fault, then they will have reasons to try better in the future.

I don’t even give a flying fuck about how autopilot compares to the average driver. Tesla has the resources to make its technology better, so we as customers should all hold them to the highest possible standard. Anything less just outs you as a useful idiot; you’re willing to accept less so someone richer than you can have more.

Your post reeks of ignorance.

I don’t think you have the capability to understand what’s going on.

It’s all about giving something for useful idiots to latch on to.

These people know most of us can’t think for ourselves, so they take full advantage of it.

This isn’t really something you can be ‘too cautious’ about.

Hopefully we can at least agree that as of right now, they’re not being cautious enough.

We need more people like him in the world.

The bullshit artists have had free reign over useful idiots for too long.

People are angry about this?

I didn’t even know he represented kindness.

He also puts into perspective how easily manipulated we all are.

We still give the most amount of power to the least trustworthy people. It’s disgusting.

I wish, but no.

For one, they would blame religion.

Barring that, they would find any other differences among us to blame.

Barring that, rich people will use their power and influence to make sure we find some way to blame each other instead of them.

The main reason why we refuse to blame rich people for our problems is because most of us want to be the rich people causing the problems. Until we can get that idea out of most of our heads, we shouldn’t expect these problems to be solved.

I don’t have much hope, personally.

Probably not, since most people don’t know this kind of information about most countries.

Na, that’s not true.

https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/practice

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/practice

I’m asking about data stored on servers.

Lemmy, for example, has its instances owned by people and those people can do whatever they want with the data that is stored on their servers. If there is ever a legal issue involving a user’s posts on Lemmy, how can courts or law enforcement determine that the owner hasn’t manipulated the data to protect or harm the user?

Sure, they can look at other servers’ since Lemmy is federated. But in the case of a non-federated service (which most are) or instance, this kind of verification wouldn’t be possible.

Thanks.

That seems like it would prevent tampering after a certain point, but it doesn’t verify that the data hasn’t been maliciously altered before the image is created.

The industry standards would be what major tech companies do in order to comply and make sure that when their data is involved in a legal battle, they can prove that it hasn’t been tampered with.

Any country is fair game since I’m interested about any general knowledge, but I’m mostly curious about Western nations such as the United States.