Just a quick check, is this location based or something, or maybe the meme was very old? Not to say that these things don’t happen anymore, but I can access this one specifically just fine.

I’m also curious. A quick search came up with these. Not sure which one is most reliable/updated

• https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/global-ransomware-attacks/
• https://www.comparitech.com/ransomware-attack-map/
• https://cissm.liquifiedapps.com/
• https://cybermap.kaspersky.com/special/ransomware

Many things are called “AI models” nowadays (unfortunately due to the hype). I wouldn’t dismiss the tools and methodology yet.

That said, the article (or the researchers) did a disservice to the analysis by not including a link to the report (and code) that outlines the methodology and how the distribution of similarities look. I couldn’t find a link in the article and a quick search didn’t turn up anything.

you should try to ask the same question using xAI / Grok if possible. May also ask ChatGPT about Altman as well

welp, guess you’re right. It’s not common but not just a few someone’s either.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human–animal_breastfeeding

tell me more about the “almost” part …

someone should make an alternate history tv show where the ship made it. bonus if it’s of a parody kind.

I think porn generation (image, audio and video) will eventually be very realistic and very easy to make with only a few clicks and some well crafted prompts. Things would just be a whole other level that what Photoshop used to be.

re: your last point, AFAIK, the TLDR bot is also not AI or LLM; it uses more classical NLP methods for summarization.

Is there a database tracking companies that start out with good intentions and then eventually gets bought out or sells out their initial values? I’m wondering what the deciding factors are, and how long it takes for them to turn.

Daredevil (the design and music is sick) and The Morning Show (the animation is very captivating to me)

Reminds me of this article https://www.alexmurrell.co.uk/articles/the-age-of-average where the author pulls in different examples of designs and aesthetics converging to some “average”.

I’m feeling conflicted with these trends, on one hand it seems like things are becoming more accessible, while on another, feels like a loss.

This especially may be relevant with generative AI - at least for the very few generative arts I look at, at some point they start to feel the same, impersonal.

They don’t seem to allow account deletions. Does it mean that this could include accounts that they still keep but people don’t use their services anymore?

forgive my naivety, how does such a community avoid promoting ageism?

what are the other alternatives to ENV that are more preferred in terms of security?

thanks for the suggestion! will check it out!

gotcha! I’ve just started to use opensnitch (for linux) but I don’t usually inspect the detailed connections that often. thanks for the tip on firefox, I’ll be on the lookout for those.

How do you view these and how would you block them by the way? Via uBlock?

got into coding cuz I found out that’s how I can automate analysis and play with research questions more easily.

this is an interesting story but for those who prefer to read, here the article linked in the video description:

https://thefourth.media/apartments/

I also ran this through smmry to summarize. Below is the result:

The Apartments With No Entrance A shady land sale has left the residents of Sea Park Apartments locked in a decades-long land dispute, with no control over their own homes.

These apartments are “Enclosed” in more ways than one: The original developer of the apartments sold the apartment’s carpark and common areas - which surround the apartment blocks - to an individual, leaving residents in the unusual position of having their homes completely encircled by someone else’s private land.

Built in the 70s and completed in the early 80s, Sea Park Apartments is one of the earliest apartments in Petaling Jaya, if not the earliest, constructed at a time when most residential developments in the area still involved landed properties.

This meant residents had no way to access their homes without first trespassing on private property, and no control over the common facilities sited on that private land.

The individual who purchased the disputed lands is Yap Say Tee, who once managed a hotel owned by the developer, and was earlier approached by the developer to manage the car park at Sea Park Apartments.

With the developer’s sale of these lands to Yap, the rules of the game changed: The developer is no longer the registered owner of the disputed lands nor responsible for addressing the remonstrations of the residents, which reached a peak in 2013.

With the facilities on private land, access road on private land, the property value will go down, and residents will have no agency.