

arch v debian?


arch v debian?
there is actually one red car in the bottom picture


except for the no reclocking thing, which cripples them


LESS CHOICE!
Choice is only exciting for us techheads. Too much of it actively harms adoption.


and they just dropped support for pascal :/
even when said “one program” is actually 69 (nice) different binaries


i want software to be easy to use. I don’t want to die in battle using my software


A Jesus icon.
Jesus saves.


he literally said it was not one of the features cherry picked to be reimplemented. So he did say, paraphrased, “because we couldn’t be bothered”


the reason is literally “because we decided not to implement it”
Saved you a click.


the hill i am willing to die on is: FUCK AI. I’ll be dead before I let it write a single line of code.


windows 10 never had a fullscreen start menu (enabled by default). 7 never had it in any way.
If the start menu was fullscreen on 10, it’s because you explicitly enabled it. It’s not the default.


that’s windows 8
it takes two instructions to materialize a constant in risc-v. X64 has LEA.
Risc-v is better!
i have mine set up so it onld syncs my photos to the pc, but not the other way round. Photos are always copied to my pc and I can safely free up space on my phone
a compatibility layer would involve dedicated hardware in the soc itself, like apple did with the m series chips


yes it does. Never disputed that. Doesn’t change the fact that the average user does not care in the slightest about how it works, not that it does work.


only among tech people. Way to prove my point. The general population only cared about easy access to free movies, they did not, and still do not care about the underlying implementation that makes that possible. My dad downloads stuff occasionally, I assure you, he does not know what bittorrent does


that’s because the tech people think p2p is what made bittorrent popular. It didn’t. Free stuff being available on it is what did.
it’s the default solution in my house because of the cats