Yggstyle

The brainworm won. And while Im not a fan of eugenics… I think america needs to do the rest of the world a solid and sterilize that 37% to protect the human race.

It becomes one of the other two when your DPS decides to stand in the no-no stuff.

While irrelevant, you’d be incorrect. Again. But let’s add some finality here using your own words.

As I already said just because most of his content is “talking head”, doesn’t mean he can’t recommend products. Which he clearly has done.

Welcome to this thread and, consequently, what everyone was pointing out to you.

Review, v.

examine or assess (something) formally with the possibility or intention of instituting change if necessary.

Dare I ask if such a formal thing might include numbers, data, and other specific metrics outside of opinions? Perish the thought.

Recommend, v.

to put forward (something) as one’s choice for a wise or proper course of action

It seems between your slip of the tongue and … Actual logic that you’d be definitively… Incorrect.

I’ll extend the olive branch in saying, as mentioned prior (Venn): there are some overlaps so you’d be forgiven for not fully grasping the difference… However the things that define those differences leave no question as to which they are - and ignoring that simply makes you … well… ignorant.

I mentioned before this wasn’t an argument. It still isnt. Its a dunce making a spectacle of his own foolishness. If you wish to continue making such a display I invite you to do so alone. I won’t be party to embarrassing you further.

Look. The last paragraph said what needed to be said. Its apparent its not a review and if you can’t see that… You’re either beyond help or a troll that is succeeding only in making themself look like those inmates from idiocracy. If you feel you need to overanalyze my reaponses to protect your ego… Do what you need to friend; it doesn’t change reality. If you can’t address the obvious flaws in your logic on the original topic you are simply running from the truth.

Both did the job of explaining different functions of the dishwasher and demonstrating, as I mentioned, that expensive stuff did not “clean more better.” To that end he literally had things independantly tested (for the sake of highlighting powders being just as-good.) I’ll go on to point out that he made several comments about pods not using the pre wash.

Again, as mentioned, even with him recommending a product… That does not make him a reviewer. If anything it was a mild advertisement … On a talking head show.

To go back to what spawned this discussion - I wasn’t arguing with you. I simply thought you couldn’t understand what the show was… Or perhaps could not differentiate. The comments (initially) sought to teach.

But, exasperatingly, here we are.

At this point you are nitpicking and being pedantic to attempt to “win” an agurment not being had. Were not even discussing the original video in question. If I wanted to approach this with the same (pedantic) energy: I’d simply focus on it being obvious that anyone with a bit of sense would have noticed that the review seemed to lack… Price, length of stands, lumens… The list goes on. If it were a review it would contain an awful lot more numbers and an awful lot less personal opinion.

Square peg: round hole. I genuinely hope we leave it there.

His dish washing video went to great lenghts to explain how something works and why hot water matters with an additional comment on different products and cost not being everything. Like any continuing series he did dive deeper into various subjects… and he did suggest some things which he used or liked. That doesn’t make it a review. Venn diagram. Its an opinion not a review.

Point in case: was he reviewing kettles in his recent water boiling video? No. But… but he ran a timer!

Its a talking head show. He’s not a reviewer. Remember Venn diagrams? Go watch a Chris Maher video where hes looking at lumens, voltage, build quality… And then look at this. Its almost as if its completely different content for a different purpose. Within that content they CAN talk about similar things or even the same product while producing a completely different video.

What is more infuriating is that they frequently don’t show the app / applet you are actually looking for until after they load a web result - which results in your muscle memory and just hitting enter working against you.

Something to that effect, yeah. I genuinely get people pointing out or raising the issue in the comments… If for no other reason than to perhaps inform the creator / community of something. But that has a far different energy than this. It almost always feels hostile.

I may never understand why people get pissed at creators focusing on an issue they are passionate about - because that viewers specific issue wasn’t mentioned or focused on. Surely there is content that aligns with what you are seeking without forcing every other creator to monologe out every possible edge case like a US drug advert reading out side effects.

I prefer to be optimistic that everyone’s reaction seems to be aligned with humanities best interests.

All that ford pinto energy with a more explosive package and better shrapnel. Its hard to miss.

… That and its hard to not see an oversized pinewood derby car wrapped in compensation. (Its ugly as fuck)

Supply and demand… We have tons of ddr4 on the secondary market - if they try to spike retail too much it won’t sell at all.

Its simply “visual noise” that tricks the viewer into thinking they are getting more of something than they are. Its a cheap inconsistent filler. Its nvidia not admitting they hit a technical wall and needing a way to force new inferior products onto the market to satisfy sales.

Motion blur is consistent and reproducible using math. The other isn’t. Something that cannot produce consistent results and is sold as a solution does have a name though: snake oil.

Awaiting the camera that inspects your feet for issues and no-other-reason in 3… 2…

A trip to japan may reveal that smart may not be a thing but borderline magical just might be.

Was it the lawmakers and regulators highly confidential information? If not please pass go and collect your $200.

Just listed some of my favorites right there. ME was way ahead of it’s time. Banger game.

That was a rabbit hole. I never heard the term prior to this. Pretty interesting.