AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1imageAsimov missed somethinglemmy.worldAMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareInternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down1·1 year agoRobot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
minus-squareIoughttamow@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 year agoUnder the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoGood start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoA truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
minus-squareBlack616Angel@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoOkay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
Robot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
Under the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
Ohhh yes
Good start, but can we change that to “first resort”?
A truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
Okay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.