• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, I feel like there’d be a lot of salvageable material that could be put to better use. Even if it’s all rusted and broken down, a ship that size has a lot of steel that could be repurposed.

    • CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 days ago

      On the one hand yes. But, and this is a big but, typically when ships are sunk by the government, a lot of environmental impact studies and decontamination processes are preformed. The goal is usually to create artificial reefs, which is pretty useful because of how much damage we’ve done to the natural habitats.

      Does it balance out, or make up for it? I don’t know, I’m not smart enough. But I do know the artificial reef projects are greatly appreciated and highly desired by local governments.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also, shipbreaking is really dirty, dangerous, and expensive, typically being outsourced to some 3rd world country.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They spend a lot to decommission the ships and make them safe. It’s just cheaper to buy an old ship and clean it up than to buy a similar amount of other artificial reef materials.

        Also, being ships in shallow water, it drives scuba diving tourists as well as creating new locations for recreational fishing.

        They’re pretty big boons for the local towns.