• nao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 days ago

    OT, but what do you mean “Sign-in Required” when trying to read the post on bluesky, weren’t they supposed to be better than twitter?

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 days ago

      This user has requested that their content only be shown to signed-in users.

      Huh. I guess that’s a feature Bluesky offers. TIL.

      • Probius@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        So the enshittification begins… I can’t think of a single valid reason for wanting only account-havers to view your post.

        • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          This is a way to slightly make a block work better to keep away from stalkers. Yes, a stalker can create another account. But it does add an additional small speed bump.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s a way to dip their toe into being closed off. Right now it’s a “user choice” so some people can slowly build the wall while feeling good about “blocking AI scrapers” (they’ll get around it no problem) or “blocking stalkers” (they’ll get around it no problem) or “blocking [next week’s bogeyman]” and all of a sudden everyone has to make an account to interact with the website but it was oRgAnIc™