• Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If I had to pay tuition for education (buying text books, pay for classes and stuff), then you have to pay me to train your stupid AI using my materials.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Good, end this AI bullshit, it has little upsides and a metric fuckton of downsides for the common man

    • peteyestee@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You don’t want to all become literally socially and mentally retarded together but apart?

  • SaladKing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is exactly what social media companies have been doing for a while (it’s free, yes) they use your data to train their algorithms to squeeze more money out of people. They get a tangible and monetary benefit from our collective data. These AI companies want to train their AI on our hard work and then get monetary benefit off of it. How is this not seen as theft or even if they are not doing it just yet…how is it not seen as an attempt at theft?

    How come people (not the tech savvy) are unable to see how they are being exploited? These companies are not currently working towards any UBI bills or policies in governments that I am aware of. Since they want to take our work, and use it to get rich and their investors rich why do they think they are justified in using people’s work? It just seems so slime-y.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    No, actually they’ve just finally admitted that they can’t improve them any further because there’s not enough training data in existence to squeeze any more demonizing returns out of.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The only way this would be ok is if openai was actually open. make the entire damn thing free and open source, and most of the complaints will go away.

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Truly open is the only way LLMs make sense.

      They’re using us and our content openly. The relationship should be reciprocal. Now, they need to somehow keep the servers running.

      Perhaps a SETI like model?

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean, make em non profit (or not for profit) and perfecly good with that. Also open source the model so I can run it on my own hardware if I want to.

        • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Open AI kind of is a nonprofit. It’s a nonprofit entity owned by a for profit entity, which is fucky and defeats the purpose, but that’s an argument you’ll see people make.