Hypothetically, that is.

  • MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Actually just stop allowing anyone with “defective” genes to reproduce.

    I am fully I wouldnt exist in this hypothetical world (-11 vision in both eyes), but I would be curious what would happen if we only ever let perfectly healthy people with no genetic defects have kids.

    Like would it eventually just become a perfect world where nobody needs glasses or asthma inhalers? Or would we die off because not enough genetically “perfect” people exist to make this plan work?

      • steeznson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah it would devolve to being like people with freckles or something utterly superficial eventually

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Any malady that could get through would, in theory, be able to destroy nearly everyone. If the response that would grant immunity to future generations were a mutation with a negative side effect attached, you’ve just ended humanity (assuming any survived). We’ve lost plant species to similar.

      This one example ignores a whole host of other problems with the idea.

    • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s sounds interesting it would also be cool to see how long before defective genes show up again