• SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Easy to say from where we sit. Harder when that job is what’s keeping a roof over your head and food on your table.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but she was compulsively murdering babies in the hospital. Can we all agree that she shouldn’t have had a job as a nurse in a NICU? That doesn’t feel like a statement with room for debate.

      • fabulousflamingos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So a baby murderer should have been allowed to keep her job and continue to put innocent lives in danger because you 1) baselessly think she’s mentally ill, and 2) think that a condition as extreme as you’re implying shouldn’t be regarded with consequence.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ok, but she shouldn’t have had her job.

      Of course not, but that’s not looking at it from the perspective of her mental illness.

      From her point of view, keeping her job was likely a high priority.