I was looking through some old vacation pictures and came across this one. It sure gives a perspective on how big these trees are.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love chopping down trees, unironically. It is super satisfying, feels ooga booga good.

    I don’t think I could ever cut down a tree like that. It would just feel so fucking wrong. It’s a goddamn miracle it’s beautiful holy shit it’s so big.

    Sigh

    • єχтяανɒgαηт єηzумэ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the Mark Twain stump in Kings Canyon National Park. In 1891 they fell this tree to display it at the Museum of Natural History. So not too sure if clear cutting occurred, but the stump is 16 feet wide either way!

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Fun fact, General Sherman (the biggest tree on earth by volume) is officially measured in baths. This is an actual sign at the state national park

    • jonkenator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Come on… American units are entirely absurd but this sign clearly displays both cubic feet and cubic meters.

      These numbers are difficult to conceptualize so they’re accompanied by number of baths for context. Nothing official about baths.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Ok, yes pedantically. “An official sign posted at the General Sherman Tree measures the tree in baths. The sign was made by national park officials, posted by national park officials, and is maintained by the official national park service. Though the national park office made this measurement and posted it, it is not an official measurement of said tree. That should only be done in cubic feet and/or meters.”

        I’ve since fixed my comment specifically for your enjoyment

        Edit: forgot Sequoia was a national park. Different office, still official

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Sequoiadendron is the giant redwood, coastal redwood is the tallest, it’s unique in that it’s a hexaploid which rare for a gymnosperm, except ephedra plants. Scientist speculated it’s because it evolved from its self(cloning behaviour) although it’s capable of outcrossing too. The final genus is the metaseaquoia, the Chinese dawn redwood

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        apparently plants like to vegatively reproduce, redwood especially, one of the reason it has duplicates(6 copies of its genome) is during meisosis, during gamtes are “unreduced” so they dont form like half like normal, they just keep the duplicated genome(most conifers are diploids). its not a problem for plants when they do this, but its less common in animals.

      • Bonus @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve not been there enough, somehow missed this completely. Have to go back. Having grown up in California, in the redwoods, I understand the scale of these things but this photo doesn’t even look real. It’s nuts. So, I learned something. Thanks for posting.

  • rouxdoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    That is so freakin’ cool! The size of that plant is on display in its stumpy remains…just revel in thoughts of its original girth and height!

    Ugh…imagining it’s majesty by extrapolation makes me sad at what I see that is no longer there. That makes me sad.