Since its inception, Microsoft Excel has changed how people organize, analyze, and visualize their data, providing a basis for decision-making for the flying billionaires heads up in the clouds who don’t give a fuck for life offtheline

        • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you go that detailed, then the jvm is JIT compiler, not an interpreter, so Java code still mostly runs natively on the processor. Java is quite fast achieving pretty close performance to C++, the only noticeable problems are on desktop because of the slow jvm startup and slow GUI libraries compared to native ones.

            • wolf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Factual errors:

              • Interpreters neither need nor usually have a compilation step
              • Even processors are nowadays virtual machines, modern hardware only understands microcode AFAIK

              Words which have a common understanding in the current compiler construction world, which you define in IMHO a non standard way

              • Compiler is commonly used to refer to tools which translate higher level languages (e.g. Java, C, Python, JavaScript) to a machine representation (e.g. JVM, Arm64, x86_64, MIPS…)
              • Even in academia Java is referred to as compiled/interpreted language (at the same time)

              Factual errors about Java:

              • We have ahead of time compilers for a very long time now (GraalVM etc)
              • There are chips which implement the JVM in hardware
            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think you’re used to modern interpreted languages and are unaware of how the runtimes of interpreted languages used to work.

              Something like Basic (to use a properly old example) was constantly interpreting source code during the entire run.

              If I’m not mistaken Python was the first major interpreted language which by default interpreted the code into a binary format and then just ran the binary (and, if I remember it correctly, that wasn’t the case in its first version). By this point Java already JIT compilation in its VM for a while.

              I think you’re committing the error of comparing modern interpreted languages with how Java worked 2 decades ago.

            • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              all interpreters have a compilation step that produces machine code

              Very much not a thing. JIT interpreters are actually not that common. Most interpreters parse code to an AST in memory and then run execute said AST, without any compilation to machine code.

              the output of the standard javac compiler is not machine code that a processor understands. This is what makes Java not a compiled language.

              Listen to yourself the output of the compiler makes it not a compiled language. Java is a compiled language, and jvm bytecode can be compiled (see graalvm), or interpreted (and when interpreted it can be JITd)

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is another compilation step inside the Java Virtual Machine which “compiles” the VM Assembly code to native code at runtime.

          This is what’s called JIT compilation and has been part of the standard Java Virtual Machine for about 2 decades and the default - at least server side - for almost as long (i.e. you have to explicitly pass a parameter to disable it at startup if you want the old runtime interpreted VM opcode behaviour).

          Source: I used to design and develop mission critical high performance distributed server systems in Java for banks since before 2008 and it definitelly is capable of handling it (the bottleneck tended to be the TB-size database, not the Java application).

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh…Java source code compiles into bytecode which runs in a virtual machine. Compare this to a language like C which compiles to native machine code. Java still gets interpreted.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The bytecode is turned into native code before execution

          • Aatube@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s not how it works. If that really was how it worked there’d be no point even having bytecode; you’d just straight up get the native code. Unless you’re talking about JIT, but your wording seems to be implying that all the bytecode turns into native code at once.

            • qaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I was referring to JIT but there are also other options like GraalVM for AOT compilation.