• mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I wonder, why is ‘literally’ so special?

    Someone steps out into unexpectedly cold weather and says, “It’s freezing out here.” But it’s not below freezing.

    Someone that hasn’t eaten all day takes a bite and says, “I was starving, this is the best burger I’ve ever tasted!” They weren’t really starving, and they probably didn’t just rank every burger they’ve eaten.

    We exaggerate and/or use words incorrectly for the effect so often, people are constantly using words “incorrectly” but then they say, “I’m literally dead right now.” and dictionaries change their definitions and people point out semantics. It’s like literally is figuratively magic.

    • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 days ago

      It’s almost like language is radically democratic and words only mean what we largely agree they mean, with fluctuating cases based on particular contexts.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      “Freezing” is an exaggeration of “cold”, just like “starving” is an exaggeration of “hungry”. It’s “a lot of X”.

      “Literally” is not an exaggeration, it’s the opposite of “figuratively”. It’s “-X”.

      Those are two entirely different things. But of course inflammable means flammable.

          • oo1@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 days ago

            No, it’s just another example that words’ usages and meanings can change a lot, even flip, over time. A new usage can literally spread like a virus meme and become the meaning - at least to all intensive porpoises.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              I know, it’s completely normal. Doesn’t mean I have to like a particular usage.

    • theblips@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah, somehow “literally” is the only word in a figure of speech that cannot be part of the figure at all! They are so smart for pointing that out

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think “literally” should be an exception because it’s the only word to clarify when we’re not speaking figuratively. It’s like making your safe word “fuck me harder”.