• Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I agree, but realistically there’s an entire private and public military behind this administration they could use against the people whenever they feel necessary.

      The same people that argue what JD Vance does about the interpretation of the constitution not allowing for judicial decisions to supercede executive, also argue that it is up to an executive leader to uphold good/law and order as he sees fit. When it comes down to it, liberty is secondary to whatever the leader determines is necessary to maintain law and order.

      Adrian Vermeule is a Harvard constitutional law professor who has been making the argument favoring executive authority and power over liberty for a very long time.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree with you, I just mean there’s a lot of Americans with guns, that have and are usually prepared to shoot people on their property. Whether they get in trouble? Idk depends if they figure out how to organize in time.

        I just hope sometimes

        • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          An angry group of civilians would not stand much of a chance against an entire military/police force.

          In addition to the entire military/national guard, state police, you also have Palantir and blackwater now on the side of the government

          • Banana@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You’d be surprised what a disbursed guerilla force can do. Additionally, that assumes the entire army is still behind him even after he’s stripped so much from veterans.