• Noodle07@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There only needs to be 1 functional one for it to kill thousands or even millions

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It takes a lot to launch a nuke and land it accurately. I’m guessing Russia lost that ability years ago and they know it hence the sable rattling.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know though my instinct says you’re overstating the complexity. Doesn’t really need to “land accurately” so much as detonate above any target population. Could just even be conventional ordinance with a nuclear payload.

          • Oderus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know it’s not simple. Many things need to work in a certain way so they need to be maintained. Batteries must be replaced, systems must be tested frequently and security is very high. This is all expensive and knowing how cheap Russia is and lax their maintenance is, I’m betting many components were stolen which makes a success lunch much less likely.

          • AnAngryAlpaca@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Soyuz rockets do not sit in a stockpile for 40 years without maintenance before being launched.

          • Oderus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One has nothing to do with each other though did you hear they just lost their Moon lander?