• MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honesty, this is going to be way way way more humane than lethal injection. I’d prefer the state not have the power to kill it’s citizens but if they are going to, I want it to be painless

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Took the words out of my mouth.

      I oppose the death penalty but if it’s happening regardless, then at least let’s be humane.

      • Czarrie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a guy is being executed wrongfully and he’s certain there’s no hope for escape, pretty sure he’s not going to be excited by the idea of going through a painful hell as well just to prove a point.

  • krellor@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m conflicted on this. I want the death penalty abolished, but also recognize that a more humane death lessens suffering.

    What I don’t want is humane methods of execution being used to further normalize the killing of citizens through a flawed and biased judicial system.

    I hope these humans methods are adopted, and that people keep pushing for executions to be abolished.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my opinion, death penalty is never a solution. For many reasons, but one of the biggest ones being that countries with death penalty don’t have less crime for which death penalty is punishment, implying it doesn’t really work. Another reason being is that when government kills someone it’s doing it in the name of all, making us all murderers. Perhaps the biggest reason is making sure person actually did it. Law is not about who’s right but who argues best. Time and time again we’ve been proven this fact, especially when the rich are involved.

      • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also it costs a fuckton to prosecute and in many ways is any easy way out. What, you’re giving the guy who shot 3 kids and then tried to shoot himself the death penalty?

        Life in prison, where the food is just enough to not starve, the healthcare just enough to continue your suffering, where you’re surrounded 24/7 by the worst of humanity is about as close to hell as we know exists. Just put people in there.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know it might be a fine line, but there’s a difference between punishment and torture.

        • twisted28@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I would rather the tax money, which would likely be in the millions, be spent on schools and bettering peoples life. Not the furtherance of misery. You want to torture someone. When a person has undoubtedly perpetrated terrible crimes, put them to sleep. Who gets their rocks off thinking about the suffering someone is gonna Go thru? Sick fucks

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instead of inventing new methods to kill people, has anyone ever thought of, well, just not killing them?