• Depress_Mode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I’m sure that’s true for many people. When European tourists visit the US, however, how many are actually going deep into the interior of the US? Most tourists, I’d imagine, would be staying somewhat near one of the coasts and mainly sticking to the major cities. I doubt many Europeans have anywhere in Nebraska on their itineraries. Probably not a ton of European tourists in the US right now anyway, but I mean in the recent past at times of relative political normalcy.

    It makes sense, though. Most people who are travelling don’t have the time or money to spend months seeing all the highlights of a place as large as Europe or the US. Even just these countries offer a ton to see, whether its the cities or the countryside. I can’t speak for how well-traveled Europeans are, but very few people in the US, even those who have lived long lives here, are able to say they’ve even visited every state, let alone seen the whole country. I bet that’s probably true of Europe for Europeans, too.

    I myself don’t have much money for travelling, so I’ve only been to 11 states (and never even left the country), and I certainly did not see everything those states had to offer. Some states are often called “fly-over” states and, frankly, aren’t usually considered worthwhile places to visit anyway (even by Americans), so you can be forgiven for skipping those. I’m sure Europe has its equivalents, too.

    • wieson@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      The US is not a continent though. You can say, you went to Italy and France. No one expects you to specify the states and say “I went to Lazio, Tuscany, Lombardy and Rhône-Alpes”.

      • Depress_Mode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Yeah, but in the same sense that when one says they’ve “travelled” the US, chances are they’ve only actually seen a small portion of the country, just like it’s a little dubious when US tourists claim to have “travelled” Europe and only actually seen a small portion of the continent. The contiguous US is only a little bigger than Europe, most US states rival European countries in terms of size, and many European countries have administrative regions (using whatever term they prefer) that are also roughly the size of many US state counties, so I feel it’s actually a pretty apt comparison all the way down. San Bernardino County, CA, for example, is about the size of Tuscany.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        You need to read the replies. The Dutch in particular are apparently very annoyed that people do this and only visit Amsterdam or Copenhagen. There are quite a few others in here as well. People just looking for a reason to shit on others is all that’s happening in here.

        • sbird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 days ago

          I would like to interject, the Dutch aren’t Danish…Copenhagen is a city in Denmark…

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      But calling Spain, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium etc. the equivalent of Nebraska is just wrong.

      • Depress_Mode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Of course, and that’s not what I had in mind, either. All of those places are most certainly worth making trips to. I’m just assuming there are some countries even most Europeans don’t bother visiting. Maybe Moldova (sorry Moldovans)? Again, I don’t really know, though.