• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The problem is you can’t get rid of nickles without getting rid of either quarters or dimes too. Without nickles you would have a denomination (25c) that has no way to be made by lower coins (10c dimes can’t equal 25c). So you either need to get rid of every coin, every coin except the quarter, or nuke the quarter and nickle concurrently and only use dimes, forcing prices to be multiples of 10.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Its just awkward if something costs 1.15 and you just have a dollar and two dimes. No way to make change for that despite it can be summed from coins (3 quarters 4 dimes) so it will for sure occur in a real world situation where nickels are gone.

        Imo a funnier (unrealistic) solution would be to just change the value of the dime to 12.5 cents.

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 days ago

        That isn’t the specific problem. The problem is that you need a way to make up the difference between them. Example: If someone pays $1.00 for something that costs $0.35, how do you make change without a .05 denomination?

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s the same issue with the penny, you round up or round down.

          If you have no penny, when taxes on your item make the total equal to $5.03, you pay $5.05. if the total is $5.02 you pay $5.00.

            • bss03@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              When I was implementing penny-rounding for Canada in Point-of-Sale software, I was told we were legally required to round in a specific way.

              I would imagine the U.S. probably will do something similar. Tho, we might follow the model of some of the other countries that have eliminated their pennies. Executive orders are a poor way to cover all the knock-on issues that some with eliminating the penny.

            • Pyr@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              As long as there’s no collusion it should generally even out with random purchases. Unless you constantly buy the same order every day that ends in 3 cents and rounds up you might pay like $5 more every year.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think this is the way. And, in memoriam of the quarter and to celebrate the massive increase in half-dollar production, we open with a 50cents for 50states where we produce half-dollars with 50 alternative “tails”, one for each state.

        I doubt it’ll happen in this administration, but at least we are getting rid of the penny, finally.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          They don’t have to be. The old silver dollar coin was huge, but the sacagawea dollar coin is no bigger than a quarter

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            It would be a poor idea to introduce a coin that couldn’t be easily accommodated by coin-op machines. The Sacajawea was specifically designed to be the same size and magnetic signature was previous dollar coins so that coin-op machines that has taken “silver dollars” would also take Sacajaweas without updating.

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Why’s it a bad idea to get rid of coins at this point anyway. What can you still buy that is a fraction of a dollar that actually matters? Anything that cheap can just be sold in multiples that amount to even dollar amounts.

      Getting rid of coins and rounding to nearest dollar sounds great to me but I don’t know what the drawbacks are.

      • mister_flibble@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        There’s still some edge cases floating around. Some laundromats, parking meters, using a shopping cart at Aldi, older vending machines, bottle deposits, probably a few more but that’s off the top of my head.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        “Getting rid of coins and rounding to nearest dollar sounds great to me but I don’t know what the drawbacks are.”

        I just want to thank you for having the best analysis that I will see today. You are correct that this would be bad and it is nice to see that you understand that you might not see this.

        We would be screwing the poorest very hard by making everything round up. Should we have the person literally counting pennies suffer because you want fewer coins in your pocket or because the “it costs more to make than it’s worth” people are too daft to get that we use pennies many times over?