TL;DR:

Image showing the release times for Starfield

Image comparing the different editions of Starfield

Minimum Specs:

  • OS: Windows 10 version 21H1 (10.0.19043)
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, Intel Core i7-6800K
  • Memory: 16 GB RAM
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti
  • DirectX: Version 12
  • Storage: 125 GB available space
  • Additional Notes: SSD Required

Recommended Specs:

  • OS: Windows 10/11 with updates
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, Intel i5-10600K
  • Memory: 16 GB RAM
  • Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
  • DirectX: Version 12
  • Network: Broadband Internet connection
  • Storage: 125 GB available space
  • Additional Notes: SSD Required
  • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will say once more. Do not preorder video games. It could be shit, it could be buggy, but what it won’t do is run out of copies. Wait until the reviews are out, or even a bit after it launches if you can. If you’re anything like me you have hundreds of games you haven’t played yet so what’s an hour or a day in the grand scheme of things.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also on Gamepass. You can play it instantly for a much lower cost to make sure it works. Then buy it if you still want later when it goes on sale.

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Duh, the reason there’s Game Pass on PC is for people to stay on Windows. Microsoft saw the writing on the wall when Valve released SteamOS and scrambled for a way to keep people on Windows.

          And it’s working for me (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻

          Send help.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, MS wanted to compete with PlayStation Plus. Linux constitutes about 2% of users on steam. MS doesn’t care about Linux gaming and steam OS is no where choose to being a threat to them.

        • thorbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It does work on steam deck actually edit: you can downvote me but I’m not wrong, it works great through a browser

        • Squeak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Linux isn’t officially supported anyway. That’s like saying it doesn’t work on PlatStation…

            • Squeak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not through gamepass.

              I love my Steamdeck, it’s great. But ultimately, most games aren’t originally designed to be played on there…

    • pikmeir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was burned too bad with Cyberpunk 2077 that even though Starfield seems to be all right, I’m waiting until after reviews come out before I pick up a copy. That just means I wait a few more days to reduce the risk of more pain.

      • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man I wish I could even get a consistent impression out of anyone. I’ve been scrounging for pre-release footage but Beth is being weirdly tight lipped about this one.

        100% a wait for the reviews situation, the less they show off the more I worry they’re hiding something. Just a reminder to everyone, Fallout 76 was the last game they released…

      • Lethtor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cyberpunk also seemed alright, even the reviews were glowing. Well, we all know how that turned out

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree completely and would like to add especially if it’s a Bethesda game. I can still remember waiting for half a year for Skyrim to be playable on PS3 after buying it on launch day.

    • ComradeKeen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m normally with you but the opportunity to play it on a long Labor Day weekend was calling my wallet to action.

      • oryx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same, and with Game Pass it was just a $30 upgrade. The only stuff I pre-order is stuff I know I’ll like anyway - mainly Destiny expansions and TES/Fallout/Starfield. I’m gonna buy it anyway, why not pre-load it and play immediately?

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    REMEMBER: NO PRE-ORDERS. Safest bet is to wait a year after any Bethesda release to give modders enough time to fix the game.

    • rab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or pirate it until they fix it, that’s my plan

    • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Am I crazy or has there been almost no pre-release coverage of this game?

      Oblivion and Fallout 3 are two of my all-time favourite games (I’ve played the others as well but those 2 stuck with me the most) but I just cannot get hyped for this game. It’s like a black box with people’s hopes and dreams, and it feels like people are just hyping themselves up by imagining what could be inside it.

      I couldn’t imagine pre-ordering this game in particular. Beth has been so quiet I’m worried it may just be a total flop.

      • Odo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bethesda put out a long video around Summer Game Fest that spent 45 minutes showing most of the gameplay systems in the game. It was honestly a bit overwhelming.

        Reviewers are quiet because the NDA is still active. It should end sometime today (Aug 31).

        • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I watched that. It was almost all dev talk, some views on the major city, and some promises. I meant like, I haven’t seen ANY impressions from outside the company that made the game.

          But yeah, review embargo is up so let’s see

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s finally happened … my 1070 is finally below minimum requirements for a game I want to play. Guess this will be an Xbox only game for me because I am not paying the insane prices for GPUs.

      • beefcat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Intel’s GPUs are an insane value now that they’ve got a lot of the driver kinks worked out. Some DX11 games still don’t run as well as they would on equivalent Nvidia or AMD hardware, but most newer games are using DX12 or Vulkan nowadays.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          now that they’ve got a lot of the driver kinks worked out

          And dropped their prices considerably

        • oryx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If/when I finally build a PC, Intel Arc is going to be a serious contender for me. They’re looking really good as they continue to support them.

          • beefcat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And they outperform AMD on ray tracing workloads, so I think they will age better as more games start shipping with RT features over the next year.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s assuming I have $237 laying around to play a game id also need to spend $70 on.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I run most of my gaming through GeForce No Can’t afford to replace my 1070 and streaming the games seem to work fine for now.

    • Raxiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, for the GPU that is. I don’t have or want an Xbox so I guess I won’t be playing it for a long time. Not that I ever play Bethesda games at launch anyway.

  • Ertebolle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t own an Xbox or PC, I’m going to wait until they decide milking money out of an old game > exclusivity and play with the future GOTY edition on a smart refrigerator or a Playdate or whatever other weird platform they repackage it for.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You reminded me it’s not on PS5. The PC my partner (who might be interested in this) plays on can’t handle this. So…guess we won’t play it. Oh well.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty hyped for this game. I love space RPGS and haven’t had something cool since Mass Effect.

    • Aermis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is Bethesda. There’s no way it’ll be anywhere near as refined as mass effect.

      But that means this will be more fun. I love me some Bethesda bug chaos. And mods.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally I love Elite Dangerous, but have still only spent ~50 hours in it.

        It’s a fantastic flight sim. But IMO it’s just not as captivating as a purposefully created narrative. It’s good for different reasons. I know they’ve added ground/walking stuff since last I played. I know you can discover alien stuff and wander alongside the ‘story’ in the game. But it’s closer to FromSoft style reading text descriptions and forum posts to follow the story than it is playing an RPG.

      • jon@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I played the original Elite on the BBC, and then Elite 2 & 3 on the Amiga. Elite Dangerous on the PC was just plain dull by comparison.

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also love space RPGs. SWTOR was pretty great. It’s an MMO, but it has good single player. The Knights of the Fallen Empire/Eternal Throne DLCs are basically single player games and they’re really good quality. The KOTOR games are also really great, if a bit older and KOTOR2 was basically unfinished and requires mods to make it even feel 80% finished.

      Outer Worlds was okay. It certainly does in some ways feel similar to Fallout in space. But not quite as good and I don’t recall being aware of any serious modding scene.

      But huh, I thought there’d be more, but I’m struggling to think of space RPGs with a feel like Mass Effect or Elder Scrolls. I’m really looking forward to this, too, cause despite being a buggy mess, I love Bethesda games and I also love sci fi (especially in space).

      Not an RPG, but I also love Stellaris. It’s a strategy game, but really scratched that hyper advanced sci fi and space exploration itch.

      • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I really liked the Mass Effect Series, it’s no Freelancer or Freespace but if Starfield even feels a little bit like what No Man Sky was doing it should be good. Fallout series and TES proves it will be buggy but fun.

  • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it still 30 fps on Series X? I don’t think that’s acceptable for a first-person game in 2023.

    • beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You say that, but Immortals of Aveum probably would have benefited immensely from a 30 FPS option.

        • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t follow this game. Can you explain why a lower frame rate is desirable here? Is it just too demanding to run at 60+?

          • beefcat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It is the first shipping UE5 game that uses both Nanite and Lumen, and with insanely detailed environments to boot. It holds a pretty stable 60 FPS on the PS5, but it runs at 720p internally and upscales to 4k using FSR2, resulting in some very questionable image quality.

            I think these features are insanely cool and their commitment to supporting 60 FPS is commendable, but this really is a case where I would actually prefer 30 or 40 FPS with a higher internal resolution.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not going to get better unless companies start making consoles with 1-2 year life cycles (which won’t sell, because at that point, you may as well be swapping parts out of your PC of Theseus).

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why? If the game has been targetted at 30 though development and everything built around that it should be fine.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You really believe that? Have you played New Vegas at 30 and 60 fps? Go ahead and try it out. I’ll wait.

    • LUHG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      SSD has been a best practice requirement for a long ass time anyway. SSDs are cheap now.

      • beefcat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I just bought an 8TB chonker last week for $340. It comfortably fit my entire Steam library of 19 years with room to spare.

        A year ago this same drive was still averaging ~$650-$700.

        • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In case someone’s wondering about cheaper options; Samsung 980 500GB NVMe M.2 costs as much as £32 GBP (~40 USD), and 1 TB version is £52 GBP (~65 USD).

    • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It shouldn’t be a surprise. Games load assets on the fly to save memory, which would be terrible on a hard drive.

              • Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well that’s just not factually accurate. The accurate thing would be it causes so little wear and tear it might as well not count on the memory chips. But using ANYTHING causes wear and tear to build up eventually and a SSD has more points of failure than just reading and writing to the memory.

        • Zyrxil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well some games now rely on the speeds of SSDs since the newest consoles have them, so that HDD does not in fact work fine anymore.

    • AngryMob@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes. Now that all the consoles have ssds, devs are going to design their games around them. That means asset streaming is the norm. And that means hdds will cause massive pop-in and stutters.

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly if you don’t have an SSD save 50$ and get one. Especially for crappier pcs it’s the most significant upgrade you can do and not even for gaming. 10 years ago SSDs were somewhat niche. They were expensive as well. Now I won’t even touch a computer without one basically.

    • BlinkAndItsGone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s probably not 100% necessary; even Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart (which was designed to use the PS5’s fast loading speeds to switch between worlds on the fly, and supports the latest DirectStorage implementation on PC) can be played off a hard drive, tests have shown. But any PC recent enough to play Starfield on really should have an SSD.

      • beefcat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Playable” and “good experience” don’t necessarily mean the same thing though. Those rift transitions in R&C are rough on anything less than a decent NVMe SSD. Though there may be some room for improvement, as even high end NVMe drives struggle to handle these transitions as gracefully as the PS5.

        Whether or not playing off an HDD is truly a dealbreaker though depends on where in gameplay the storage speed bottleneck causes problems. For Rift Apart, it’s mostly just an issue with these rift transitions, and the gameplay effectively pauses while it waits for them. For an open world game it could be more problematic (i.e. pervasive traversal stutter during combat.)