June 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention posted a report on Tuesday that said evidence does not support a link between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders, ahead of a two-day meeting of an advisory panel later this week.

  • WeirdyBeansAt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s all well and good, but the people leading these organizations believe that science = jumping to a vibes based conclusion and then smashing a bunch of shit together calling it a process. It doesn’t matter if the sources are just made up or simply not there. Actual data driven results are for egghead gay communists who think chem trails are fake.

    • MPD@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      I wonder if this is a last ditch effort to get info out before it all get rolled back pseudoscience becomes gospel.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Just wait until that son-of-a-bridge RFK Jr. gets to it. I hear he has a fresh shipment of Sharpies from the White House to make sure it is totally accurate.

    He will start by editing out the “not” in the above quote. See? Science works!

    • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Way too coherent and clear. You forgot the proceeding “Uh wuh wuh buh bup wah we well…”

  • NeonNight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Too many people can’t grasp that autism symptoms show up around the age these vaccines are given, and that it often causes your child to regress to a degree. But no, they don’t want to accept a complicated answer that doesn’t let them blame somebody.

  • Brown5500@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I don’t think this headline belongs to this article.

    The article is talking about how the study referenced a non-existent source

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m inclined to believe it, but the CDC has very little credibility right now