cm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day ago"thanks"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1275arrow-down129
arrow-up1246arrow-down1image"thanks"lemmy.worldcm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squarethebestaquaman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoI would think that, since it’s been recognised that these messages are costing a lot of energy (== money) to process, companies would at some point add a simple <if input == “thanks”> type filter to catch a solid portion of them. Why haven’t they?
minus-squareotacon239@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 day agoBecause the only progress we know how to make on computers is backwards it seems.
minus-squarewizblizz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoGenerative AI is supposed to be destructive. It’s a feature.
I would think that, since it’s been recognised that these messages are costing a lot of energy (== money) to process, companies would at some point add a simple <if input == “thanks”> type filter to catch a solid portion of them. Why haven’t they?
Because the only progress we know how to make on computers is backwards it seems.
Generative AI is supposed to be destructive. It’s a feature.