• Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    East Asian countries solve this by having the kids take public transit; just run a few extra buses and trains on the routes kids take, then you don’t need dedicated vehicles that sit idle all day.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      With trains all you have to do is add an extra passenger car or two for the peak times and keep the number of trains running the same. You could also increase frequency during peak times if you have the track, train and driver availability to do that

      • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I dunno, that sounds like socialism.

        Good thing we were saved from the horrors of broadly accessible and efficient mass transit decades ago.

        • Sirdubdee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Could you imagine how dangerous mass transit would be if it was full of middle schoolers, calling out your biggest insecurities, while you’re just trying to get to work? John Mulaney educated us on the danger of them years ago.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not sure which ones you’re talking about, but in Hong Kong, schoolchildren just walk to school. There’s usually a school attached to each housing estate.

      • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        You get a free pass as a student, but public transport in most of LA still requires a (relatively) long walk. Depending on where you live, might be a deal breaker.

        It is much cleaner/safer than most people think though.