This is a joke, I didn’t really lock myself out

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    12 days ago

    even worse. I regularly have to get up out of my chair and go down 2 stairs.

    Also this took a while to find, but : https://sourceforge.net/p/shorewall/svn/HEAD/tree/branches/4.2/Samples/one-interface/shorewall.conf

    ADMINISABSENTMINDED=Yes

    Is an actual setting in the config for the (now apparently unmaintained) Shorewall Firewall software/tool for linux.

    If I remember correctly, it always checks on firewall rule changes if there is an active connection on port 22, and adds a special rule at the end to maintain that connection.

    They don’t build them like they used to anymore.

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They don’t build them like they used to anymore.

      Well if we did, the way it works would be by telling a chatbot to enable ssh on port 22 at the end.

    • qaz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I’d rather plug in a screen with VGA than deal with HPE iLO 4

      • mkhopper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        To be honest, HPE iLO 6 isn’t too bad, if you’re using the GUI. It’s the API that remains really broken in many places.

      • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Networking noob here; what, pray tell, is HPE iLO4… or do I want to even know?

        Edit: Never mind. Found it. HP… shudders

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 days ago

          “In December 2021 Iranian researchers at Amnpardaz security firm have discovered rootkits in HPE’s iLO (Integrated Lights-Out) management modules.”

          Because of course lol

        • qaz@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I remember there being the option of using HTML or a Java applet, I chose the former

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            If you have the HTML5 option you should be on a pretty recent firmware.

            Interesting that you’d prefer going (literally) analog connection rather than over the IPMI.

              • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 days ago

                You know, I wanted to say “Bet!” and proove your wrong as I couldnt believe they never went past 2023 for the firmware.
                Turns out that was the latest.

                But I do know they have more recent firmware uploads for the UEFI than 2023. ^(A year younger but no less nore recent/s)

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Don’t practically all commercial hosting providers provide remote console access?

    This seems a combo of an extremely newb mistake in an extremely unusual scenario - worthy of Gru I guess.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          Could be they were configuring the actual network firewall and got a couple of rules out of order so they blocked all of their out of band access

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yes, I also used to run an “on premise” server - in my kitchen, not 500km away. I sometimes might need to admin it remotely, but never critical setup work.
        And the meme makes it sound like they have to drive there specifically to fix it, like nobody is actually living nearby.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I mean it’s a pretty realistic scenario. I happened to be the unlikely remote hands for the company I work for just a few weeks ago.

          Company: an industrial cleaning company with about 1500 AD users and about 8000 employees, historically had 2 corporate offices, currently has three as it’s transitioning one corporate office across the country

          Server and mistake in question: old admin who’s no longer with the company setup the ESXI 6.0 cluster in the server room at the office without documenting the root password to access it. This cluster happens to host the companies critical services including AD so being unable to access the host has been blocking the office migration. Old admin had also not fixed the ESXI backups which have been broken for over 3 years so no backups to restore from. Also the out of band access to the servers was never correctly setup

          I happening to be close to this office and having IT experience was poked to go in and with physical access to modify the shadow file and set the root password to be blank. Had I not been available they would have had to fly someone in from the office 2000 miles away or hire a very expensive local contractor to come in after hours to do the same thing

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Well, I have my server running in my parents basement, because they have fiber, and I don’t.

          It’s not quite a 500km drive, but still a long enough distance for this scenario to be a major inconvenience.

          But since I have wireguard running on their router though this specific scenario is not something that could happen to me

          • buttnugget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Wireguard is a VPN protocol, so you are able to tunnel into their router to…do what exactly?

              • buttnugget@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                Please forgive the ignorance here. What are you trying to do? I thought you were trying to reboot an offline server. I’m probably just confused!

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Well, the original post (as in the image) is about locking yourself out of a remote server by changing a firewall rule, thus needing to drive to the server to access it locally.

                  By using wireguard to tunnel into the router, you can remotely enter the LAN, thus bypassing the firewall, as if you were accessing the server locally.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’ll always be grateful for the firewalls like OpenWRT that will automatically revert any changes if you don’t log back in after a few minutes (at least on the web interface). I’m not proud of how many times that’s saved me.

  • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    Does it actually happen to people? All servers I worked with both had a back door (or two), and someone at the data centre (during work hours at least) you could contact in an emergency.

    • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Most data centers have some kind of service where you can request a KVM to be connected to the server. It’s not instant as an actual human has to do so but a lot sooner than another human driving long distance. I guess in this case, it’s a mid size company that is big enough to have multiple locations yet small enough to still manage to use on-premise infra instead of data centers.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      iptables default DENY and flush the rules. Done by at least two people I know (then me) at the same company. Led to them moving the servers in-house and virtualizing some services to connect to the hypervisor. It does happen though.

      Anti Commercial-AI license