• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    In the context and how he said it, it implies the comments came after his imo. It was already quite clear at a glance by the time he commented.

    Why is he saying “actually” if he’s responding to being told he didn’t look through the comments, by affirming he didn’t look?

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      They said “I only saw comments saying XYZ”.

      Your response was “literally a lie”.

      Any context making you believe this is false does not make it “literally” a lie. At best, it’s “literally” the truth being portrayed in a misleading way (which, I really don’t think it is).

      Not really sure what your goal is anyways. They obviously didn’t see the comment. Why spend time hyper-analyzing the probability of if they might have seen it or not?

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Hi, I’m from 10 hours into the future, I looked at every comment on this post and not a single other one called it AI.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The comment was bullshit in the first place and the fact that it wasn’t AI was already pointed out. I am fucking tired of the slop police so maybe I’m being a bit too intense about it.

        Maybe I misunderstood and he was agreeing with me that he didn’t read the comments, but it just didn’t come off that way to me.