Nothing that’s a ‘hit’ in the modern day will have any of the staying power of say, Beethoven.
Even now, hits are dead within a few years. The average person is being conditioned to only ‘consume’ entertainment that has been recently released.
To hopefully drive this point home, notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he’s parodying? Nobody thinks this will be the case when a song is new and the consumer bandwagon is being told to like it.
I’m sure people thought, say, something like SAIL would ‘stand the test of time,’ but it’s actually cringe as fuck to listen to now. That’s not going to change as time passes.
Notice how Elvis, the ‘king of rock’ has no staying power? I’m sure if you told people that he’d be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they’d look at you like you’re crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they’re trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.
There is contemporary music that will stand the test of time, like from Ulrich Schnauss and Felix Laband.
You seem to have a bias where the only music that matters to you is Intelligent Dance Music and maybe classical.
I listened to a bit of Ulrich Schnauss while typing this (Blumenthal which played into Clear Day) and…it was aight. I don’t usually listen to dance music, so there’s probably something I’m missing, but the way you talked it up as the only modern music that matters, I was expecting some crazy composition techniques that you’d never hear in anything even remotely pop-adjacent.
notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he’s parodying
I can name one song where I think this is true (Ridin’ Dirty > White and Nerdy.) Seriously I have no idea where this comes from.
Notice how Elvis, the ‘king of rock’ has no staying power?
But what about the Beatles? They have a lot more longevity and aren’t that much younger. Elvis was the king of an embryonic form of Rock and Roll, and in general I don’t think the earliest versions of genres age well. The earliest forms of hip hop are generally seen as being cheesy and having extremely simple flows, and if you try to throw back to them today, you’re seen as making a shallow parody of hip hop, but when you get to the styles that came to prominence in the 90s, the songs are still widely listened to and beloved. Anecdotally I have trouble seeing pre-bebop jazz as jazz. Bebop is what brought in so much of the complexity that we associate with jazz today.
Notice how Elvis, the ‘king of rock’ has no staying power? I’m sure if you told people that he’d be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they’d look at you like you’re crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they’re trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.
None.
Nothing that’s a ‘hit’ in the modern day will have any of the staying power of say, Beethoven.
Even now, hits are dead within a few years. The average person is being conditioned to only ‘consume’ entertainment that has been recently released.
To hopefully drive this point home, notice how Weird Al parodies have more staying power than the songs he’s parodying? Nobody thinks this will be the case when a song is new and the consumer bandwagon is being told to like it.
I’m sure people thought, say, something like SAIL would ‘stand the test of time,’ but it’s actually cringe as fuck to listen to now. That’s not going to change as time passes.
Notice how Elvis, the ‘king of rock’ has no staying power? I’m sure if you told people that he’d be irrelevant now a few decades ago, they’d look at you like you’re crazy. Meanwhile, literally nobody gives a shit about Elvis unless they’re trying to be different or for whatever reason had his music shoved down their throat.
There is contemporary music that will stand the test of time, like from Ulrich Schnauss and Felix Laband.
But have you even heard of either of those?
You seem to have a bias where the only music that matters to you is Intelligent Dance Music and maybe classical.
I listened to a bit of Ulrich Schnauss while typing this (Blumenthal which played into Clear Day) and…it was aight. I don’t usually listen to dance music, so there’s probably something I’m missing, but the way you talked it up as the only modern music that matters, I was expecting some crazy composition techniques that you’d never hear in anything even remotely pop-adjacent.
I can name one song where I think this is true (Ridin’ Dirty > White and Nerdy.) Seriously I have no idea where this comes from.
But what about the Beatles? They have a lot more longevity and aren’t that much younger. Elvis was the king of an embryonic form of Rock and Roll, and in general I don’t think the earliest versions of genres age well. The earliest forms of hip hop are generally seen as being cheesy and having extremely simple flows, and if you try to throw back to them today, you’re seen as making a shallow parody of hip hop, but when you get to the styles that came to prominence in the 90s, the songs are still widely listened to and beloved. Anecdotally I have trouble seeing pre-bebop jazz as jazz. Bebop is what brought in so much of the complexity that we associate with jazz today.