Air Canada flight attendants said on Sunday they will remain on strike and challenge a return-to-work order they called unconstitutional, defying a government decision to force them back to their duties by 2 p.m. ET (1800 GMT).

Air Canada had said it planned to resume flights on Sunday evening, a day after the Canadian government issued a directive to end a cabin crew strike that caused the suspension of around 700 daily flights, stranding more than 100,000 passengers.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees said in a statement that members would remain on strike and invited Air Canada back to the table to “negotiate a fair deal.”

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 小时前

    I don’t understand how a government can tell workers to go back to work. Like, if Air Canada is unhappy with their employees, they should fire them and rehire. And spend all the time and money it requires to retrain them. Oh wait, that’s not feasible across the whole industry? Guess you better pay these talented professionals what they are worth, then.

    Like, how can workers refusing to work possibly be illegal? It’s insane. Even if the argument is that not working went against some kind of work contract they have, that should be a civil issue not a legal one.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 小时前

      Back to work legislation ostensibly exists for situations where a strike compromises public safety or well-being. Healthcare workers or power plant operators or what have you.

      You could argue that even this is too far and the employers involved should be the ones on the hook to do whatever is necessary to get things running, but the ad absurdum argument there is that it would effectively mean those employees have infinite bargaining power.

      It definitely gets misapplied though, and this is certainly one such case.