• Postimo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    The idea that manuals in linux are a good way to learn and understand new software is peak linux neckbeard bs, and I will die on this hill. I congratulate OP on the exact type of autism that lets them feel this is an effective and useful method for learning new software, but if there is desire to have a greater adoption of linux maybe its bad to be snarky at folks for not instantly understand the terminal based documentation conventions of some dudes in the 70s. Maybe an alphabetical* list of all possible options is okay for referencing or searching, but is objectively insane way to learn or understand a problem.

      • tomkatt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        You might be thinking of info pages. The man pages are just the instructions, feature flags, etc. generally, while info (when available) usually has a more general / layman description of the command with examples.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      It’s a good thing there are other resources, then. You can read tldr-pages. You can look at various official and unofficial wikis. You can look at Stackoverflow. You can look at Youtube tutorials. You can ask other people. Hell, you can ask a chatbot.

      If the average user is unwilling to do that, maybe it’s better that Linux does not see a wider adoption.

      • Postimo@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Agreed! You can look elsewhere, and that’s how I, and I think many other folks, learned. The OP was talking about the manuals though, specifically mentioning /usr/bin. So to restate my point is not to say it’s impossible to learn linux, but that man pages are weird and bad place to push folks looking to learn.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 days ago

      There’s other ways to get info. And man pages are a great way to learn how something is expected to work on your system. And it’s offline, without ads, scams, ai generated false info.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      Name calls people who read documentation.

      Does not offer any alternative.

      “No John, you are the neckbeards!”

    • bluecat_OwO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      initially when I was learning linux. I had troubles finding the command I needed. I could have first gone and read everything and then come back to try, which I did. But sometimes the man pages, the ubuntu and arch forums weren’t as great of a help as messing up myself.

      Could there be a better way to document with slightly more examples: yes. Would it help: tons

      But this is just my opinion, and I am just a noob

    • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      THIS. I feel like linux man pages are as useful as an Analytical mechanics textbook for someone who just wants to drive. Like yes, sure, it’s amazing we have such a detailed documentation but for God’s sake just introduce basic usages first