Nearly a third of Americans – 30% – say people may have to resort to violence in order to get the country back on track, according to the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll.

It’s a sharp rise from 18 months ago, when 19% of Americans said the same.

  • rozodru@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think people realize that if a new US civil war kicked off the lines wouldn’t be as clear as north vs south. this would be state vs state, city vs city, neighbor vs neighbor. you could draw lines in your god damn sub division/street.

    And if it were alliances between states it would be a god damn logistical nightmare. Imagine California being allied with New York for example. or Hell Minnesota being allied with like Arizona or whatever. how do you move supplies, troops, and what have you between allied states when you got a shit ton of hostiles between the two.

    Add to the fact that unlike the first civil war you now have US military bases all over the world. what happens when you got folks within the SAME base in the middle of Germany that suddenly don’t “agree” with each other?

    Cluster fuck is an understatement.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’d also be a shit-ton of drone warfare. Thousands will die without ever seeing their killers face. It’s also entirely possible AI will be bombing people and you’ll basically be killed by an algorithm.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Lets also not forget cyberwarfare, ranging from external to internal sources, ranging from doxxing people to invented news events with AI gen/manipulated images/audio/video, all the way up to knocking out public infrastructure, locking down hardware of local gov / businesses / banks with ransomware, etc.

        Random, unofficial people are capable of either most or all of that.

        Oh and of course if shit really kicks off, other countries will probably do the CIA’s signature move of funding arming and training various groups of people.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s also why we need to avoid violence and make the regime stumble into itself.

      Which is why Chinese and Russia propaganda is attempting to stoke the fire (remember, they eliminated their opposition, so they don’t have the same experience inciting violence and they think they do).

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also why we need to avoid violence and make the regime stumble into itself.

        Here’s the thing: It’s not going to fucking do that; it’s going to stumble into fascism. Fascism is stupid and incompetent, but it absolutely does not and will not fizzle out without a resistance as committed as the fascists themselves. I mean, which fascist movement in history “stumbled into itself?”

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I saw one dream map where Canada drops two tentacles; one reaches down through the West all the way to San Diego, and the Eastern one reaches just north of Washington.

      Humor aside, I agree with your take. A war of assassins and terrorists on both sides.

      I’ll add one more note. Back in the day, the Irish Republican Army was the most feared underground in the world. They only had a handful of soldiers, but a superb organization. If a shooter was supposed to kill someone in Geneva, he’d have three or four cars waiting when he got to the airport, and each driver would know five places the shooter could stay. He’d have a choice of getaway drivers and extra safe houses and docotrs on tap.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        How do you still manage that in the current (and worsening) surveillance state? I mean Luigi showed its possible for a lone wolf but I have to question being able to organize without being known. If you are caught organizing an antifa org then you’re also uber boned.

        • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          My point was that the next war won’t look anything like the last one.

          Anyone who thinks that some molotov cocktails they made is going to bring down the system has another think coming.

          • errer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            In my view the only way organization would work is with the assistance of an enemy nation with the ability to circumvent the surveillance state (to ship in weapons, avoid communication eavesdropping, etc). And unfortunately those nations are mostly very, very far away.

      • bufalo1973@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can think of a funnier map: Canada taking NY, Washington DC, … and Mexico (re)taking the west coast. Imagine if Texas ended up being again part of Mexico.

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is why the techniques pioneered by the native americans, and taught to colonial rebels by their experience fighting with them, would be the most likely path.

      What is that, you ask? Guerilla warfare. It’s why we were able to defeat the most powerful colonial empire since the Romans.

      We had the same conditions you described, a good chunk of people who still considered themselve British were mixed in with those who sought freedom.

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you think this, you should talk to your average republican voter. They will suck that orange cock until every bit of their wealth and ability to afford food is gone, and blame whoever fox news points a finger at that day.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would be a clusterfuck. Especially since the type of violence some have advocated for recently is more akin to political assassination. We need to push back on the false equivalence of “person X says stuff I don’t agree with about perceived identities, therefore that speech ‘unpersons’ me, therefore it’s tantamount to a death threat, therefore actual violence against that person is justified.” You can literally find examples in these comments here.

      If you have thousands of lonewolves each deciding unilaterally to assassinate (insert political opponent or public figure here) based on their own subjective perceptions, that no longer resembles a civil war, it more resembles a free-for-all hellscape.

      I’d suggest a more useful concept is to form strong local communities committed to their own well being, mutual aid, and defense. Whatever that looks like for you in your area. Your mileage may vary. This is not legal advice.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There may have to be a free-for-all hellscape phase before getting to an organized something-better phase in the hit video game super mushyroom kingdom.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      or Hell Minnesota being allied with like Arizona or whatever.

      Isn’t Hell in Michigan?