But the difference is nothing compared to the accompanying computer tower.*

*Edit 1

  • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Not necessarily, if the LCD has local dimming depending on the dimming zone size it could be more energy efficient in dark mode.

  • nagaram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yeah I’m not doing it for the energy savings I’m doing it for personal comfort.

    If I was really concerned about energy use at that scale I would simply not use a computer.

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I use dark mode to save my eyes, not energy.

    Interestingly though I haven’t had OLED display on any of my devices since 2015.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      LCDs work by using energy to block the backlight strategically. OLEDs work by only lighting up what you’re likely to be able to see in the first place, no backlight.

  • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    It almost certainly is slightly more energy intensive, that’s just how LCDs work. I wasn’t under the impression that was why many people prefer dark mode.

  • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I just think it’s funny that, way back in the DOS days, dark mode was the only mode, then GUIs and the web were the “modern” thing, and if you didn’t like, fuck you too bad… Now we’ve gone full circle.