• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    $400K isn’t “wealthy” by any calculation. It’s not nothing, but it’s not enough to live on. Unless your expenses are like $16K per year.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Give me 400k right now and I’ll buy a house and live forever on fuck all because I’m safe and secure in my own home. That means so much, owning your home is wealth.

    • snippyfulcrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kentucky is also a fairly low cost of living state which is something to factor in too.

      My husband and I combined make waaaaaaay the hell less than 400k a year and we aren’t rich but I’d say we live fairly comfortably here.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It goes pretty far in a shithole like Kentucky. You’re right that it’s not wealthy, but it is wealth.

    • krnkkty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      so, like, the median income in Germany?

      Edit: I said that based on this. I think the Wikipedia link is about wages specifically (e.g. it counts only full-time employees), not about income in general?