For me it’s probably speech therapy and everything pertaining to that. I’m yet to encounter someone on here who is one apart from me (in training).

What about you?

  • Druid@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ah, that’s interesting. A common problem of studying logopedics in Germany that I’ve heard of is that you don’t get enough time for practical applications of the theory you learn about, hence an apprenticeship is preferred to a university degree. How was it with your course of studies?

    I’m also interested in ASD, specifically coupled with late-talking children. I don’t think ASD is a separate subject in school but rather something a therapist needs to be interested in intrinsically and needs to learn about in additional trainings, but it’s just fascinating how differently it manifests in people and what effect it has on their speech development and interactions with peers.

    But I’m not sure if I really want to work with children in general. I’d rather focus on conveying specific logopedic goals to adults who come to therapy out of their own volition and interest in their own betterment instead of constantly having to think about how to motivate children, how to put a therapy goal into a certain game that interests them etc etc. It’s obviously also challenging and difficult since you need a good feel for how to interact with children, but it’s just not for me. Currently trying my best with two patients I have (one has DVD, the other has a couple phonological language development disorders mixed in with some problems with speech motorics), but it’s just so much more challenging for me compared to the voice therapy I’m giving. Adults - that’s where it’s at for me.

    Yea, LSVT is quite rigid, I feel like. It also goes against everything we’ve learned about physiological vocalisation which feels weird. I also don’t like that they’re kind of “cult-like” when it comes to advertising the effectiveness of their method in addition to the secrecy of the therapy itself. At least give a bit of an outline about what your method is about? Plus the costs… Sure, the course’s costs would probably be covered by the practise or clinic I’m working at, but the fact you have pay for knowledge in the first place is just so annoying. I get that people need to be reimbursed for their work and need to earn money to live, but it’s just so much money. But I guess it’s worth it if you have a lot of patients with Parkinson’s.

    I hear you about dysphagia. I’ve had that same realisation in my last internship at a clinic. Probably around 95% of patients I’ve seen there had some form of dysphagia with varying degrees of severity, and it’s awesome to see how much the work we do helps them. To me it feels like it’s not a lot that we do outside teaching patients a couple swallowing maneuvers, stimulating their nerves with citric acid or spice, or adjusting their meal plan to something easier to process, but it’s so much more to them.

    Thank you! I’m in last year of studies, so it’ll be quite stressful and challenging for the next half year or so, but I’m hopeful and happy to have found a profession that’s so multi-faceted.