• Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Problem is that many are clustered and in high-traffic areas. There’s a triplet of them in one area near my neighborhood, covering entrance and exit of said area, so it’s impossible to avoid detection.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      i suspect some of them are the newly installed speed cameras in low-traffic areas. yea its rather suspicious to have one where there is almost no pedestrians or rarley any traffic to justify have a speed limit camera.

    • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Remove the devices. Like, go up to it and destroy it.

      Obviously, wear a mask and common clothing

      • SolacefromSilence@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I bet they’d search for cell location records, in order to find who damaged the cameras. I hear that even turning your phone off won’t help. Surely they’ll be caught unless someone also leaves their phone at home.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          17 hours ago
          • leave your phone at home
          • instead of destroying it, wrap it in duct tape or something like that, because afaik obstructing a camera owned by a private company which happens to be placed on public property is not illegal
      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I figure sniping them from a long distance would be a good tactic. Of course, I neither own a rifle nor have any sort of marksmanship training so I could be wrong.

        • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Well, be careful… You would not want to miss and have that bullet hit someone.

          But it does start an interesting conversation: what are some ways, that don’t involve guns, that could take one out from a relative distance or… If they had to get close, take it out quickly?

          Unfortunately, blowing something up is always a good idea until you lose a hand.

            • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I definitely think there could be a situation where a drone could have some kind of spray paint device connected to it and the drone could be used to access difficult locations, like over freeways, something high up, or even just for some anonymity. Blocking the view of the camera I think is the number one goal. Obviously creating policies that prevent these cameras from existing would be best, but I just don’t see any of that happening in the United States at least for the next few decades.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I used a bregen clone (it’s a big R/C helicopter, sometimes used for aerial photography/film) to deal with a box elder infestation that was causing problems.

                Soapy water, inside a sprayer that may or may not have been based on ww2 era flamethrowers. (The water tank was charged from a pressurized air tank.)

                • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  i imagine that was pretty loud. Did you use some kind of FPV screen to target or just eyeball it from the ground?

                  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    mostly just eyeballed it. to be honest, the nozzle/water tank were both pressurized to about 50psi, and it didn’t take a lot of accuracy. I used a pump-and-spray canister that I made a new top for, to take a pneumatic line coming off a pancake air canister as the charging bottle.

                    the nozzle itself was at the end of boom that could point straight down (it could elevate between 0 and -90 degrees,) (the line to the nozzle was just the flexible hose coming off the weed sprayer normally.)

                    The hardest part is dealing with the constantly changing CoG as you spray.

                    If I hadn’t already had the big boi, I’d have figured something else out, but i did, and it worked well.

                    As for noise… its’ a freaking huge helicopter… so yeah. it’s noisy. it wasn’t a gasser though, so there’s that. (It was a homebuild thing that happened because my hobby shop had a deep clearance on the rotor blades and hubs- the disk is 1m,)

                    if your goal was hitting flock cameras, I’d recommend strapping a paintball marker to a 250. (or a quad if you prefer, but I’ll save that rant for elsewhere.) just stay away from systems that go through the internet or are made by companies that ‘automatically’ register you for a sUAS license with the FAA. They typically nark. (Especially DJI.) And a lot of those systems will frequently prevent you from flying in “sensitive” areas, even if it would be otherwise legal.

    • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The upside is some are installed illegally and have no legal recourse just littering their shit on public land.