• Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 minutes ago

    Wayland is the one thing that fixed a whole shit-ton of my problems overnight and now I find out nobody wants to use it under any circumstances.
    ¯\(ツ)/¯ Alrighty then

  • Xylight@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    x11 when you try to use 2 monitors that don’t have the exact same atomic composition:

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I think it took me 2 years to get six monitors on two GPUs working consistently under X11. Yes, I’m that fucking stubborn.

      Wayland worked right from the start.

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I still use X11 & will continue to do so for as long as possible. Wayland’s not bad, X11 just seems to works better…

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Im on boring mint, and Wayland sucks on it. Literally disables my ctrl and shift keys, and volume keys, and backgrounds are only black. Unusable. And I have all amd, 13 year old cpu. Oh and it screws up video playback

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Mint is pretty late to the Wayland party with Cinnamon. It’s probably one of the worst distros to try to use Wayland on.

  • ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I like XFCE because is simple and my PC is a toaster with an NVIDIA card so…whenever I have XFCE on Wayland I’ll switch to it.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve considered switching several times in the past, but each time there was something I needed that was not supported (e.g. - this issue with Zoom screen sharing)

    In the last of these times I found no such dealbreaker, but I did want to try a dualboot setup - or dual-login, actually, because I should be able to switch at the greeter - first, to make sure I’m not breaking anything I need for work. This required switching from LightDM to a display manager that supports both X11 and Wayland. I don’t remeber which one I’ve chosen, but I do remember having hard time installing it (I think I couldn’t get it to launch i3 for whatever reason)

    I’ve just checked and is seems LightDM supports Wayland now, so maybe it’s time to try the switch again. Being able to use my current DM means I’m not going to risk breaking anything. Probably.

      • Acidbath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        ngl i only made this comment hoping someone would provide a solution lmao

        majority of the features does work but when it comes to plotting in octave, nothing shows up. last time i checked it was something to do with qt(something).

        for rstudio i dont remember what problems i had but booting into x11 solved these issues.

  • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is what I am going to think about every time I am being stubborn and refusing to move until all my demands are met. “I shouldn’t back down, I’m Christopher fuckin’ Walken!”

    • deltapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      One of the things that keeps me on x11 is xscreensaver. I disable the desktop environments blanking and install xscreensaver each time I load a system for myself.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yeah, so, switching to wayland still break copy/paste from terminal apps, still requires me to disable all hardware acceleration lest firefox freeze and plasma’s effects are visually broken, and it randomly swap my screen on each boot.

    Meanwhile, no issue at all on X. I’ll still wait a bit.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That sounds more like escape sequence not being interpreted, but maybe? It’s a mess.

        Basically, in some implementations (it’s true for at least KDE Plasma), the console app is never seen as “active” (the terminal emulator is), and as such can’t access the clipboard, something like that. There’s third party program you can use, and plugins for things like VIM, but when you get a step further with remote clipboard it’s even worse. And even when solutions exists, there’s weird caveat like “it will work all the time except if you’ve clicked somewhere in the past few seconds” or something.

        I’m sure things will improve over time, but “we’re not there yet”.

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It’s fucking weird people have such strong opinions about issues like X11 and systemd. They’re meant to be working in the background away from the user, and that’s exactly how I treat them. Actually systemd still provides some functions a user might have to interact with manually, for X11 I’m just baffled.

    When I take an uber, I don’t care whether the car has an automatic or manual transmission.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think the average user wouldn’t care, Linux just attracts nerds. And I think it’s totally fine and even good that people care how their computer works—it shows that users care about their software working for them, rather than just wanting to go along with whatever is given to them. I think a lot of the positions people take about these things are very silly, but I’d still prefer someone to have a silly opinion about X11/Wayland or pid 1 than to not have an opinion at all. It’s nice that users are being actively involved in deciding what they want their system to be; it’s a nice change from the average user who’s like “well microsoft is screenshotting my screen every 5 seconds and feeding it into copilot now, guess I’m going along with that”.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      When I take an uber, I don’t care whether the car has an automatic or manual transmission. But I care what MY CAR has! Especially since there isn’t a shop for my car and I have to do all my own maintenance. Like, init/systemd is a huge architectural change, it’s weird to you that people who depend on their computer to perform whatever function gives their life meaning and viability want to have a functional grasp of their system? That’s a big change to absorb for essentially no practical benefit to the problem domain.

    • UnityDevice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Gnome forced me onto Wayland a few weeks ago and I’ve been dealing with issues ever since. Some issues even affecting the most basic level tasks like typing text, imagine dealing with that in 2025. Following your analogy, if the Uber with the fancy new transmission came to a halt every kilometre, you’d care too.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There are still existing issues with wayland that do not exist on X11. I’m talking, using last-gen consumer grade hardware that will break basic applications like, who knows, a web browser. Meanwhile the “upside” are extremely marginal to a lot of people. Different screen scaling isn’t implemented using proper DPI on most implementations, variable refresh rate is not something most people care about (I sure don’t care that my second monitor is capped at 120Hz instead of 144Hz because of my first monitor), etc.

      So, yeah, for some people, it’s not a matter of preference, it’s a matter of having a stable, working system vs. a broken system where basic features are not a given.

      If you took an uber and the car was a horse-driven carriage and your seat was a hole in a rotted plank, you’d complain.

    • embed_me@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I used to use some features that only worked on x11. Slowly I found alternatives or workarounds on wayland. So I understand the sentiment. Imagine you book an uber but it’s electric so they say you can’t book a ride that’s too long

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I love your metaphor because it is exactly the kind of pedantry that is usually at play with X11 vs Wayland.

        “I can’t take an electric uber because it has an effective range less than 400 miles!”

        Who the fuck takes a uber to a destination over 4 hours away?

        A normal person rents a car, takes a bus, catches a train or buys a plane ticket. Ain’t no one faring a uber for a long trip to another city. But that’s exactly the kind of complaints from people obsessively clinging to X11. They have a hyper specific use case or workflow that almost no one else uses.

        • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Every single person has different problems and priorities, and until hyper specific use cases/workflows work on Wayland, many will stay on Xorg.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I understand and agree. Anyone who has a super specific use case that means they still use X11, go ahead, no one is stopping them. But to complain or trash Wayland on that basis is asinine. Every single change in paradigm breaks someone’s workflow, that’s impossible to avoid. But the responsible thing to do is to adapt either with new tools and resources, or with a slight change in workflow. They act like people are taking away their toy, when in reality it is just adding to the pile of available toys. But they are upset because their toy is old and won’t get repaired anymore, while the new toy is slightly different but a bit easier to clean and repair, so they get upset at the other kids for playing with it. Ignoring that the new toy doesn’t make the old toy disappear.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I’d have to change desktop environments, because my current one only has “experimental” support in the latest version, and my distro is years behind, anyway. Your choices are pretty much KDE, Gnome or building your own desktop with a standalone window manager, and I don’t like any of those options.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      In my eyes, it’s the same deal as conservatives coping with the changing world. There is a version where they just shut up and let the rest of the tech landscape improve while they happily stick to the X they know (X.org or even XLibre).

        • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Unless I’m terribly misunderstanding the word’s meaning (or anglophones once again redefined a word to reflect their current sensibilities), “conservative” doesn’t automatically imply politics, just that someone is resistant to new ideas. A person who only listens to music produced before the 20th century and goes into a rage when video game music composers are mentioned is a conservative, but not in terms of political views.

        • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Getting left behind is the natural and inevitable consequence of obsolescence.

            • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Yes, the people who refuse to either upgrade to Win11-compatible hardware or move to an OS compatible with their existing hardware will eventually get left behind. Both in terms of security and compatibility. It’s happened many times, from the fall of AGP in favour of PCIE, to every time Intel inroduced a new CPU socket. X11 is the next.

  • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    IMO Wayland surpassed X11 a long time ago… As it doesn’t shit in the pants with tearing on video play or touchscreens with multi-screen.

  • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Correcto X11 just works for me, never had any issues, there is literally zero benefit for me swapping over.

    Every time I am booted into a Wayland session, something doesn’t feel, look or work right which causes me pain and suffering through my OCD which i don’t have.

    I’m planning on trying hyprland soon though because it can look very pretty so if I swap over to that then yes I’ll be a wayland pleb, but in that case there’s a real reason to me swapping… not just for zero benefit.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Give me server-side decorations, or give me death!

    (won’t add the whole of GTK as a dependency, so that my input handling can be handed over to whatever is GTK doing.)