• spacelord@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wouldn’t say it’s only for the extra paranoid, but rather for everyone.

    After reading the whole discussion, it’s clear that the repo transfer was handled in an extremely unorthodox way, at least by usual standards for repo handovers that I’m familiar/experienced with.

    Communication from Catfriend1 was absolutely nonexistent, and there was only minimal info from the person who took over using a GitHub account created just two days ago.

    Trust is something that must be earned, not given to someone you’ve never seen or heard of before.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not sure if I qualify as extra paranoid but this whole situation feels very sketchy and has me reconsidering my use of syncthing. Making significant changes like this without any explanation is extremely bad practice.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      has me reconsidering my use of syncthing

      This is about a third party piece of software that isnt directly related to syncthing. The devs of syncthing have however been recommending syncthing-fork as their choice for android, so it definitely needs clearing up.

      • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 month ago

        We’re sort of in this situation because the official project decided not to continue providing an official Android app, yet people want to use it on Android forcing unofficial versions to be created and maintained.

        I get that they don’t want to deal with Google Play anymore, but somebody has to deal with it and them not owning the app is putting users at risk.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, I only use it via syncthing-fork so this is a distinction without a difference to me.

    • tychosmoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same here. It was already a little bit concerning that I was relying on a smaller fork to get syncthing on Android. It was on my to do list to figure out options. Now it’s at the top of the list, and I’m not doing updates for the time being on Android. That’s almost the entirety of my reliance on syncthing - phone to PC sync. I don’t really need it that much for sync between PCs.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Update from Simon aka imsodin, Syncthing Maintainer

    tl;dr for android users: No need to switch apps at this time, the current install continues to work and is safe. If you can disable app auto-updates, please do that for now to be on the safe side.

    Good news: Had a good chat with @nel0x. He is a collaborator on researchxxl’s repo and just marked those releases as “pre-release”, which prevents the obtainium auto-upgrades. So we are back to no immediate risk for users and we can take it slowly, trying to establish communication and more context. It’s still possible and imo likely that nothing nefarious is going on, just a very suboptimal handover that needs clearing up. There’s no need to go dig for repos on github, the technicalities of continuing to publish an app are not an issue - the open/relevant points are about a possible direct continuation of the existing app (or not), the time/effort that needs to be volunteered to publish an app and the trust in whoever does that. Hopefully we can work something out. If you are interested in helping maintain the app, let us know, other than that imo nothing to do here except if you are a user, to do the above in the tl;dr and every now and then check-in on the status (now and then being more like every week than every hour 😉 ).

    https://forum.syncthing.net/t/does-anyone-know-why-syncthing-fork-is-no-longer-available-on-github/25661/58

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Maybe it’s actually true that catfriend1 knows the new owner in real life but… this is not a calculator app, this is something that has complete access to the phone storage… handing the keys without any communication is concerning…

    And the issues are locked so if something nefarious happens, discussion will only occur somewhere else instead of the repo

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      And the issues are locked so if something nefarious happens, discussion will only occur somewhere else instead of the repo

      people shouldn’t count on that anyways because the repo owner can delete issues, comments, also edit them

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    this entire thing has made me really rethink whether I want to swap to the new repo or not.

    Why was there no communication about it. The gplay repo maintainer wasn’t informed of anything, no public notice to anyone was given, just a transfer of the repo and a status issue here explaining it.

    Obviously the act is genuine as they were able to keep the original keys but like, this entire system seemed really sketchy.

    I’m also not happy with the fact that it seems the first thing they added was removing checksums, but that might be a temp thing.

    I also just noticed that it looks like they removed the entire public key for it, which if they had the original private keys using the existing public keys shouldn’t be an issue right?

  • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The new repo has two releases in it now. These releases are not signed with the original key as far as I can tell. Further, GitHub is silently redirecting to the new repo, even in Obtainium, meaning it’s possible that if you had this previously installed via Obtainium and updated now, you may have unsigned apks installed that may or may not contain the changes in the repo.

    This is a mess. I deleted the repo from Obtainium (luckily I don’t auto install updates) and will wait to see what happens over the next few months. Might just save my notes in a network share instead of using syncthing from my phone. Idk, notes are all that I was using it for.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sounds like a really good reason not to use Obtainium, if any repo you have tracked for updates can just redirect you to a completely different repo If they have the keys - and throw no complaints when updating to an entirely different apk.

      With F-Droid they at least have to have the same signing keys, and the code is built by F-droid from source - meaning the code for the supplied APK always matches the code on the repository for the build. Whereas Obtainium will just offer you any APK the dev releases on their GitHub/Gitlab/etc, this places much higher trust on the dev.

      Edit:
      my bad, I wrote earlier that all F-droid builds are reproducable. But that’s not accurate F-droid does not enforce that all builds must be reproducible. They have been helping devs with the tools and assistance to do so since 2015, and all the apps that I use I’d checked in the past and are all using reproducable builds, so I wrongly presumed it was mandatory now. Eg, Syncthing-Fork from Catfriend has had all builds reproducible since v2: https://verification.f-droid.org/packages/com.github.catfriend1.syncthingfork/

  • Takios@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thank you for the notice. This is a really bad look on the project. Thankfully I still have a version from before the takeover installed and disabled auto-updates just in case. Though I suspect f-droid will not accept builds by this person until trust has been established.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    My policy with open source projects like these is to fork the repo and only bring in upstream updates when I’m certain it’s safe and necessary

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which is just as risky as instantly updating unless you’re really closely keeping an eye on which updates are security related.

  • smeg@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    What’s wrong with original Syncthing? Why would anyone use a fork?

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I had intended to try it out, but now uninstalled for… just in case.

    Some kind guru please watch the source for unwanted effects.

  • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I installed mine from F-Droid. I just went there to turn off updates and it doesn’t exist. I have not been paying attention so it may have been gone for ages and not related?

      • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Interesting - mine is syncthing-fork 1.30.0.4. When I go to the App Info page it says “App installed from F-Droid” and when I tap on that button I get a small pop-up that says “No such app found.”

        • zeca@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          The 2.0 update was made into a new package in fdroid, so that you paid close attention to the upgrade, as it could maybe break things.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          During the update to 2.0 you had to uninstall the 1.3 version then install and restore your syncthing-fork settings. So if you are still on 1.3 that’s probably why you aren’t seeing it. Should pop up if you search F-droid for the 2.0 version.

              • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                I think everyone misses the upgrade except new installs, how users (including power users) can know that they have to uninstall the old app, potentially lose all the settings , then reinstall and reconfigure?

                • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I knew because I install through F-droid instead of github so ended up getting like a notice informing me that to upgrade to 2.0 I should back up the settings then uninstall 1.3 then install 2.0 then back up settings.

                  But, if retrieving from github or obtanium then maybe message wasn’t relayed.

  • adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    For some reason, my version of syncthing-fork is old and source is not even on f-droid anymore. Was there any other before catfriend1? Perhaps I downloaded APK from GitHub… Can’t recall.