• drgeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    does immich have an option to automatically delete older, backed-up pics from devices in order to free up space and not worry about running out disk space on smartphone?

    I tried to search the docs and it seems it’s missing

    • Everyday0764@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      it’s wip, they are iterating it

      i think they added it as beta, then reverted, then now is being reworked

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve not seen that option, but I use syncthing instead of the phone application to sync my photos to a specific folder on my NAS which is then an external library for Immich.

      TBH, I don’t want anything deleting anything automatically.

      I’ll often delete newer pictures of temporary stuff but keep older pictures of my frinds & family, so, that’s not a feature I’d see any value in. It tends to just make me lazy and build up GBs of junk photos on my NAS (and backups…)

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        That sounds like a great solution to my current frustration that the autobackup feature of Immich on iOS is so opaque. It only works when the app is open and even then oftentimes you’re just staring at the backup screen while seemingly nothing is happening, despite Immich’s backlog of thousands of photos still needing to be uploaded.

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No but there is a semi work around.

      When using the app if you select all images one of your options will be delete from device when you click on that it will say hey some of these might not be backed up and one of your option is to only delete the things that have been backed up. It’s not automatic but it is a way you can kind of just Mass do it to everything

  • kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    What does the $100 server key unlock (besides “supporter status”), since features aren’t paywalled?

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        77
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Oh, so… 100% worth every penny, then. Finally, a software cost with actual benefits.

        Edit. It sounds sarcastic, but I’m being serious.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      As we’re committed not to add paywalls, this purchase will not grant you any additional features in Immich. We rely on users like you to support Immich’s ongoing development.

      • kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I read that. (I literally mentioned features not being paywalled in the original comment.)

        If the key doesn’t unlock features, what does it unlock?

        Do you get a little thank you message from the devs when you enter it in? Does it add a “Supporter” tag next to your name on the app settings?

        The practice exists in both software and games of adding paid cosmetics (e.g. Discord or Deep Rock Galactic) that don’t change the core featureset but allow users to pay more to support the developers, so I think it’s a valid question.

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bragging rights and improved sleeping ability from the knowledge that the devs are being supported.

      The serious answer is it’s often easier for people in a company to buy a license key than it is for them to arrange a donation to the devs. So this is an easy way to make small donations.

    • richmondez@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a donation that is deceptively framed in my opinion, bit of a dark pattern, but the product is fully open source so most give it a pass.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It still doesn’t do chunked uploads, right? For who has a low memory proxy or uses cloudflare

        • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not arguing with you, it’s just a choice.

          The question was whether Immich had to be executed from within a container system… and it doesn’t have to.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        “not running in a container” is not “running on bare metal”. It’s just running outside a container.

        • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I guess that’s true.

          I’m running it outside of a container and outside a VM… as there’s no abstraction layer on top of the underlying OS. Which I guess is inside the bare metal.

          So, Yep.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            “Bare metal” has traditionally meant without any os either. Your code executes directly on hardware and has direct control over everything. Like a micro controller.

            Code in a container executes on the hardware in exactly my the same way as code not running in a container - with the os as an intermediary.