IN FEBRUARY 2024, without warning, YouTube deleted the account of independent British journalist Robert Inlakesh.

His YouTube page featured dozens of videos, including numerous livestreams documenting Israel’s military occupation of the West Bank. In a decade covering Palestine and Israel, he had captured video of Israeli authorities demolishing Palestinian homes, police harassing Palestinian drivers, and Israeli soldiers shooting at Palestinian civilians and journalists during protests in front of illegal Israeli settlements. In an instant, all of that footage was gone.

In July, YouTube deleted Inlakesh’s private backup account. And in August, Google, YouTube’s parent company, deleted his Google account, including his Gmail and his archive of documents and writings.

The tech giant initially claimed Inlakesh’s account violated YouTube’s community guidelines. Months later, the company justified his account termination by alleging his page contained spam or scam content.

However, when The Intercept inquired further about Inlakesh’s case, nearly two years after his account was deleted, YouTube provided a separate and wholly different explanation for the termination: a connection to an Iranian influence campaign.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    20 days ago

    Can I ask a dumb question? Even if this was true and for the sake of argument we assume that the dude is an Iranian propagandist of some kind, so what? Why does that justify removing the account?

    • clgoh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 days ago

      Probably because of US sanctions on Iran, which prohibits the delivery of services for individuals or companies in Iran.

      • falseWhite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        20 days ago

        “independent British journalist Robert Inlakesh”

        I guess they can just decide that anyone they don’t like is Iranian and remove them.

        • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 days ago

          I think the youtube removal is a load of crap, dont get me wrong…

          … But yes, the british part means nothing. You can have russian spies act like american journalists too. Welcome to international espionage and infiltrations. Stuff like that has happened since the middle ages :')

    • Devolution@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      There is no youtube alternative. I’ve been begging Lemmy to find me one and nothing. Also, anyone constantly getting the Turning Point ads despite blocking them and reporting them?

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        20 days ago

        A service like youtube is simply hard to pull of with bailing twine and string (like lemmy).

        A core part of the service that youtube offers is re-encoding uploads. That requires some beefy hardware to serve even a moderate number of people.

          • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            I use youtube in safari and adguard works, and I can listen to audio in the background/have PIP. Maybe it’s my plebe eyes but since I watch mostly video essays, I don’t even notice the 720p limit on a screen that small.

    • dönerpate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I don’t think PeerTube will ever replace YouTube. I love the idea behind PeerTube, but all the content creators are on YouTube because that’s where they can monetize their content. That’s not really going to happen on PeerTube.

  • clgoh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Probably because of US sanctions on Iran, which prohibits the delivery of services for individuals or companies in Iran.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    While I wouldn’t trust Google on anything, the “journalist” cited in this article worked for Iranian foreign propaganda outlet Press TV. Even though what Google did was wrong, that’s a massive red flag. Working for Press TV is no different than Google working for the American far right oligarch regime.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      20 days ago

      On the one hand, yeah maybe he was operating as a propaganda agent for Iran. But they deleted his whole account, his email, his drive contents, and every video he uploaded. His life’s work nuked from orbit.

      You can’t swing a dead cat on YouTube without hitting 1200 different propaganda agents working for various political wings. When was the last time Google obliterated a joirnalist from Newsmax or Xinhua?