• Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I see some comments trashing dual boot, I really don’t understand why. I have really nice setup with Debian 12 and Windows 10. Boot pc, get to work on Linux, and other projects after. When I’m done and want to game a bit I switch to windows.

    I have no need to setup funky VMs to bypass games made strictly for windows, and also don’t have performance limitations.

    Just use the right tool for the right job folks.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you need that for aggressive anticheat stuff to run, that makes total sense. I personally don’t need it since proton is so good, but I also don’t understand why anyone would hate on you for that.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see some comments trashing dual boot, I really don’t understand why.

      Back when I dual booted, every Windows update was a dice roll whether and how it would decide to fuck up my dual boot setup.

      Sometimes it decides to “fix” grub. Sometimes it wanted to encrypt something new to protect me from all the theives that wander through my living room. Sometimes Windows just had an update that was 1000% sure that Windows was the default boot entry, and so doing something extremely sensitive and rebooting to finish without telling the user, should be fine.

      Windows under dual boot, for me, was like having a fragile semi-suicidal pet. I found myself doing constant research to rescue it from itself.

      Eventually I did let it die.

      So I’m not mad at it, exactly. I’m just over it.

      • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Damn, I relate to that, back when I used to multi boot several systems on the same drive, windows always found a way to fuck up the boot loader.

        Nowadays I leave them in separete drives, with debian and grub as the main option, windows don’t even have a chance to interfere since the bios boot the debian drive first.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Nowadays I leave them in separete drives, with debian and grub as the main option, windows don’t even have a chance to interfere since the bios boot the debian drive first.

          Nice! I imagine that could have saved me many headaches.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Your second paragraph tells me you haven’t even tried because the first part is just checking a checkbox in the steam settings to automatically use proton for games without linux support, and occasionally going in to the game settings (again in steam) to force it to use proton instead of a broken linux version.

      And there’s no performance limitations running them on Linux. If anything, performance is even better on Linux because it isn’t running every single possible service MS wants to minimize support time and gobble up data.

      Only exceptions to this are if you play games that want to do things in your kernel, or maybe if you’re using an nvidia gpu, depending on your distro it might take effort to get that set up properly.

      If you have an AMD GPU, it’s actually quicker to go from start installing the OS to playing a game on linux than it is in windows between a) it not trying to steal focus to upsell you on other ms products, b) gpu drivers being included in the distro, and c) the defaults just being better on linux, thus less time spent making it less annoying to use.

      It’s just no longer true that windows is the right tool for gaming, except for a list of specific games that want to invade the kernel and thus I’m kinda happy that I won’t accidentally run one. They don’t even stop cheating (which should be done on the server side anyways).

      • Cabbage_Pout61@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well, I work with devops, so I am well aware of some of the benefits and limitations of VMs, and I also tried proton. But I’ve run in tons of issues when running older games that I like, specially mmos like Ragnarock Online, Perfect World, Prison Tale. They have lots of compatibility issues with the VM, even with windows 10 for that matter, which is a little easier to circumvent.

        About performance, things like baldurs gate 3 and cyberpunk 77 that I like, have like 20 to 25 less frames on proton, to add salt to injury bg3 crashes a lot.

        Your second paragraph tells me you haven’t even tried because the first part is just checking a checkbox in the steam

        Please don’t assume thinga on the internet, steam accounts for a quarter of my time spent on games.

        I’m not here to say which one is better, just saying that bashing a completely fine option is, at least, dumb.

        ^(edit: typo)

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I really don’t understand why.

      Anti-Microsoft ideologues, mostly. Giving MS any quarter is antithetical to their chosen axe to grind. Pay them no mind.

    • highball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, you learn how to get things done. If your goal is to use something that’s strictly for Windows, then probably you should be using Windows. Same as MacOS, same as Linux, and same as any other OS out there. Same things could be said for touch screen vs. MnK vs. controller.

      • Lucy :3@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Or at least virtualize it. With USB and PCIe passthrough, you can basically use Windows for anything but direct access to some PC components (Everything not connected via USB and PCIe, so only the MB iirc), and (many) games (if you don’t have a second, just-working GPU for an VFIO-Passtrough)

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you’re on Linux, I don’t think a windows VM is very useful for gaming? Most games run fine in proton, and the ones that don’t, probably don’t because of anticheat that will also refuse to run in a VM. I do know of one niche case that needed to be run in a VM until recently, that being SS13, but that was because of an engine dependency on IE for webviews.

    • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have windows specifically for one game with shitty anti cheat, I don’t like it but it is what is is.

        • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s vanguard so don’t think that works. It’s essentially malware but I keep basically nothing of relevance on my windows side so I’m generally not super concerned. I basically just treat the entirety of windows as a security hole.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            for the record, you can technically hide the vm and bypass those anticheat checks.

            i hear its hard and annoying to setup.

            • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              That sounds VERY unlikely. I’m gonna need a source for that (with vanguard) or I’m calling bullshit

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                i found this https://github.com/zhaodice/qemu-anti-detection which supports EAC and others but not vanguard. looks quite easy to use compared to what ive seen before.

                i think ive seen ones that support vanguard before. i think vanguard needs a host kernel patch to mitigate, so it doesn’t detect the vm by measuring timing or something.

                you would have to look around a bit but i’m sure it still exists. as long as it is still our machines, there will be ways around it, else cheaters would not exist. it just requires you to participate in the cat mouse game.

                • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  EAC is notoriously less invasive than vanguard. The repo you linked doesn’t even have a fraction of what you’d need to hide from vanguard.

                  There are SO many things to hide. In theory it sounds possible, in practice just not.

                  To name a few, you’d have to hide:

                  • cpu jitter/latency
                  • interrupt behavior
                  • page table behavior
                  • msr access
                  • cache invalidation patterns
                  • IOMMU
                  • PCIe inconsistencies
                  • boot sequence
                  • driver timing
                  • CPUID

                  And so much more. It’s almost impossibly hard to hide all that. Even if you could, a tiny mistake at one point or a stealth update and you’re banned.

                  In comparison, avoiding vanguard and cheating on a legit windows machine is trivial. DMA cards are expensive but impossible to detect. DP/HDMI + mouse hooks are another impossible to detect option.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s a bit extreme. I keep a windows install around, just in case. It’s just not in grub; I have to get into the bios boot menu and manually select it.

      • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is dual booting really that common? Whenever I need to test something on windows I just use a vm

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          These days I might do that. The thing is, I’m coming from a situation where windows was installed, fully setup and configured with whatever I needed, so it was way easier to just run that than to redo everything and setup a VM.

          Also, the last piece of software I need is something used to bypass DRMs, and it kinda requires the whole thing to work flawlessly. I’ll see when I come around to launch it again if it’s viable.

        • highball@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Probably just the recent converts that are still 1 foot in and 1 foot out. I don’t keep a Windows VM. If something ever came up over the years, I have to decide if it’s worth setting up a VM. I think even 3 years back, I was able to update my PS5 controller loading up the update tool in WINE (Bottles). Didn’t even need a Windows VM then.

          • nesc@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            There are a lot of cases where windows is preferable or easier to deal with, I think just nuking it is more common with recent converts (I lolled a bit at this turn of phrase). You probably can do everything with wine + vm, bit I just can’t be bothered with passtrough and shit for the latter and update problems and requirement for 32-bit libraries of the former.

          • khar21@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Is there a good word editor on Linux? Because libre office qt lags crazy on plasma wayland, doesn’t have auto lists, or horizontal line, requires an extra package for spell check, and OnlyOffice is missing basic formatting, like horizontal lines, has memory leak issues too, and doesn’t even allow selecting multiple words at a time. Srsly double clicking selects a word, but dragging unselects it.

            • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Because libre office qt lags crazy on plasma wayland

              Ok, you’ve got something going on with your system. If LibreOffice and VMs are lagging on your system then something isn’t right.

              • khar21@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                There’s literally open issues about the lag, im talking about. And even if that didn’t exist. It’s just bad. It’s not intuitive, it doesn’t have any of the convenience features that MS word has.

                • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It’s just bad. It’s not intuitive, it doesn’t have any of the convenience features that MS word has.

                  Maybe, maybe not.

                  The last version ow MS Word I used was Word 2.0c. I quit using it because it was completely broken whenever the file got a bit large. I switched to Linux at that time and used office suites on that platform (that was before libre/open office, even before StarOffice I think, I ran Applix at the time), none of them I’ve ever had issues with.

            • highball@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              You probably want to ask a Pro Office user. I’ve just used Libre Office. Worked fine for my papers in school and edits my resume just fine.

            • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I just use Typst for everything these days, but if you really want a gui thing there’s always the web version of google docs and ms office

              • khar21@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Google docs and word online dont have many advanced features unfortunately.

      • toothpaste_sandwich@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I used to have windows installed for years back when I first stated using Linux… But it grew to where I never booted it again, so now I just use a VM in the increasingly rare cases certain software doesn’t work on Linux.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a bit extreme

        It really isn’t. That’s like saying “I keep a bottle of anthrax in my pocket just in case”. It just doesn’t you any good! (Yes, it’s a facetious example)

        But seriously, if you need Windows for something every so often, just setup a VM. Safer, cleaner, can’t mess up your host.

        • khar21@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Windows VMs don’t perform well, maybe virtio can fix their awful drivers, but until then that’s a waste of time.

          Sorry for being crude, but I hate the linux culty gaslighting.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It depends what you’re using it for. If it’s gaming, then it’s a no. But OP above didn’t say gaming. A Windows VM is fine for general tasks, but that naturally depends on the host system and how many resources you give the VM.

    • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s been over 200 days since I switched over… I bet windows would crash if I booted and tried to update

    • Mechanite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had this happen, and I updated, and now explorer doesn’t start or launch when I log in. I don’t use windows enough to justify reinstalling, so I just have a half broken windows install chilling in my PC

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No more updates might be ok now, but as soon as someone finds a security vulnerability, it ain’t getting patched. Maybe if it’s dire enough. Someone should put together a script to modify the registry for an easy v11 update path.

        • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I am pretty sure windows 7 got 1 last patch a while after it stopped just because of how bad the vulnerability was. It could happen, but it will take a lot.

  • nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also when you intentionally boot into windows and it requires at least 7 years and 9 reboots before getting ready.

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m lazy, I let it load automatically on 5s to Bazzite. One of these days I’ll have to put forth effort into loading Windows (also, I am intentionally trying to use Linux over Windows, learning new stuff as I go)

    • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just setup a script in Steam to boot to Windows (you can find it on the bazzite docs)

      For a while I booted to bazzite by default and just used that script when needed

  • buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember those pre-SSD days! If I spin up a minimum specs VM, it’s kinda like that (which I did at least five times over the weekend). Nowadays you can load Windows pretty fast. Updates might take 10 minutes though!

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Idk what i did wrong but my dual boot system just doesn’t show windows so I can never accidentally boot into it. I have to f12 to get to windows. Im sure thats a red flag somehow lol.

    • ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      os-probe, the thing that suppose to help grub mkconfig auto-detect windows boot menu entry, is by default disabled in /etc/default/grub.

      You need to:

      • Make sure os-prober is installed
      • Uncomment GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=false in /etc/default/grub
      • probably restart for good measure
      • Find out which disk partition holds your EFI system partition
      • mount that partition on /boot
      • run grub mkconfig and override /boot/grub/grub.cfg
      • Harvey656@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh neat, I have just gotten used to it and by extension means I rarely boot to windows which is a good thing in my eyes.

        Not entirely sure why I was getting downvoted though, maybe I finally gained a hater? Or was it the use of lol?

          • Harvey656@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Weird, not sure if I’ve interacted with them or not. I don’t have them tagged. @Hawke@lemmy.world did I piss you off before?

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t think so, no.

              I feel like people put a lot more stock in downvotes than is really necessary or intended. It’s nothing personal.

              Also it feels very weird to get called out like that for something so trivial. Let alone directly insulted (by the parent reply, not by you.)

              • Harvey656@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Im not sure they were insulting you, it does say “or they are a raging asshole” only if you are an asshole… which you aren’t right?

                • Hawke@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I like to think I’m not. On the other hand if those are the only two options I guess I must be?

                  That other person though… seems to be wildly bent out of shape over a downvote on someone else’s comment. I show they deleted their other comment now but: definitely an asshole.

                  Anyway, since we’re this deep into the convo, might as well explain: the downvote was mostly about someone still dual-booting Windows at this point. That was not at all articulated by a simple swipe to downvote, but a lot quicker and easier (or not, in retrospect). Does that make me an asshole? Maybe; if so, I’ll take that hit to my little reputation and move on.

                  In the interest of continuing the conversation though, I’ll ask… what draws you to keep it around? My experience when I was dual booting was that before long I found myself not booting windows for a year or two. When I did [around the time of the transition from 7 to 10], it just caused extra hassle with things updating and breaking. And the last couple of games I had “needed” it for began working fine in Linux. So I reclaimed the space, and haven’t missed it as windows 11 enshittified further and Microsoft went all in on vibe coding slop.

  • comrade19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think this when you’re finished for the night and you see: Update and shut down (4 minutes). Now you lay in bed while your computer boots back to windows for 15 minutes.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t remember when i stopped dual-booting.
    Especially now with VMs…

  • Statick@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every time I boot into windows it breaks grub and I have to arch-chroot with a live archiso USB to fix it…

  • Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The worst is if you select the windows repair entry, that takes even longer…or a old entry that doesnt have a valid installation behind it…

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Is it Windows 98?

      Jokes aside: You have to count the time from starting to boot Windows to restarting it, letting the computer do its pre-boot whatver-it-does-es, to back to grub.

      And I find a minute a long wait.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah! You’re moving goalposts! The meme is about choosing an OS at boot time, not up, down, up again.

        I’m in the game less than 60-seconds from that point. And that’s on an old i5-1135G7 NUC, 32GB DDR4, god knows how old the SSD is, been through 3 PCs without a Windows reinstall.

        Yes, Linux almost always smokes Windows on a reboot, but it’s not that big of a deal anymore.

        CAVEAT: I should note my Windows install is from an official ISO, not some manufacturer’s crapware.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ah! You’re moving goalposts! The meme is about choosing an OS at boot time, not up, down, up again.

          You’re missing the point of the meme. It definitely is about accidentally booting Windows, rebooting and then booting Linux.

        • LwL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’ve noticed that my windows always takes a minute to launch when it wants to sell me on either its surveillance bullshit or force windows 11 on me. And because I don’t launch windows that often, that is basically every time. Otherwise it’s quite fast at 10-15 seconds.

          Linux usually boots in around 10 seconds (including loading the DE after login), though sometimes it gets stuck for a bit after login for some reason.

      • khar21@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That almost never happens for me and even when it does, it’s pretty fast.